The Practice of Interventional Gastrointestinal Endoscopy at a Tertiary Referral Hospital

The ANNALS of AFRICAN SURGERY, January 2018 Volume 15 Issue 1 29 Abstract Background: Interventional endoscopy enables one time diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases with minimally invasive therapy and improved disease outcome. Local use has remained low with minimal reporting. Knowledge of current practice at a tertiary level may promote utilization of interventional gastrointestinal endoscopy. Objective: To describe the practice of interventional gastro intestinal endoscopy at Kenyatta National Hospital. Methods: In a prospective descriptive study consecutive sampling was used. Main variables were interventional procedure offered, sedation mode and immediate outcome of the procedure. Results: There were 211 cases and interventional endoscopy accounted for 21.7% of these. Introduction Gastrointestinal system presents a large number of diseases encountered in general practice (1). Gastrointestinal endoscopy is the visual inspection of the digestive canal through a fiber optic cable that utilizes a charge coupled device (2). Early publications on diagnostic endoscopy by Lule and Ogutu et al were with regard to peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori and gastro-esophageal reflux disease at Kenyatta national hospital in Kenya (3-5). Recently, endoscopic diagnosis of jejuno-gastric intususception has been reported by Mwachiro et al of Tenwek, Kenya (6). Interventional endoscopy allows one time diagnosis and treatment, with added benefits of minimally invasive surgery (7).While innovative technology continuously improve and update diagnosis and treatment of GI diseases in the developed countries, interventional endoscopy has remained at infancy level in developing countries (8). Advances in endoscopic technology and devices have led to a wide variety of new and exciting The male: female ratio was 1:0.9. The median age group was 41-50 years. Variceal band ligation, ERCP and esophageal stenting were the three most common procedures. No mortalities were recorded during the period of study. Conclusion: Our report describes application of interventional endoscopy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases with acceptable immediate outcome.


Introduction
Gastrointestinal system presents a large number of diseases encountered in general practice (1).Gastrointestinal endoscopy is the visual inspection of the digestive canal through a fiber optic cable that utilizes a charge coupled device (2).Early publications on diagnostic endoscopy by Lule and Ogutu et al were with regard to peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori and gastro-esophageal reflux disease at Kenyatta national hospital in Kenya (3)(4)(5).Recently, endoscopic diagnosis of jejuno-gastric intususception has been reported by Mwachiro et al of Tenwek, Kenya (6).Interventional endoscopy allows one time diagnosis and treatment, with added benefits of minimally invasive surgery (7).While innovative technology continuously improve and update diagnosis and treatment of GI diseases in the developed countries, interventional endoscopy has remained at infancy level in developing countries (8).Advances in endoscopic technology and devices have led to a wide variety of new and exciting applications for endoscopy and minimally invasive endoscopic surgical procedures.Variceal hemorrhage is a major cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in our local set up.Portal hypertension secondary to schistosomal fibrosis is common in Kenya since schistosomiasis is endemic in both Nyanza and Eastern provinces (9).Sclerotherapy was the first endoscopic modality followed by endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVBL) (10).Lodenyo et al reported successful endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in 112 patients at Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) in 2007 (11).Jani in 2004 described better results with EVBL regarding variceal eradication time; transfusion requirement and risk of re-bleed (12).Percutaneus Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is the insertion of a feeding tube into the stomach through the anterior abdominal wall by use of an endoscope.Ponsky and Gauderer first described percutaneous endoscopic placement of gastrostomy tubes in 1980 (13).

The Practice of Interventional Gastrointestinal Endoscopy at a Tertiary Referral Hospital
The ANNALS of AFRICAN SURGERY, January 2018 Volume 15 Issue 1 30 The most common indications for PEG placement are impaired swallowing because of neurological events, oropharyngeal or esophageal tumors, dysphagia, severe facial trauma and poor volitional intake (14).The procedure is cheap, less invasive and no need for general anesthesia in most cases which is a challenging factor in debilitated patients, to whom gastrostomy tubes are most commonly placed (14).Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a technique whereby an ultra sound transducer is incorporated into the tip of the endoscope or a probe is passed through the channel of the endoscope (15).It is now the most accurate imaging technology for staging tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, retroperitoneum and mediastinum (16).Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) uses duodenoscopy to identify the major and minor papillae.The biliary and pancreatic ductal systems are cannulated and opacified with contrast material to provide diagnostic information.Other diagnostic tools may be used in conjunction with ERCP including brush cytology, biopsy, intraductal ultrasound, cholangioscopy, and pancreatoscopy (15).Endoscopic gastrointestinal stenting is the use of luminal tubes (Stents) to maintain or restore the lumen of hollow organs (16).Ndonga et al in 2008 reported a series of a hundred endoscopic esophageal stent insertions at St. Mary's hospital in Nairobi for esophageal cancer (17).Foreign body retrieval from the GI system has been employed using the endoscope.Bane and Bekele (18) have reported their experience of gastrointestinal foreign body extractions under light conscious sedation using flexible video endoscopes in children and adults at Adera Medical center in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.There is little publication from our local hospital on interventional endoscopy.

Methods
This was a prospective descriptive study carried out at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) endoscopy unit.For a six month period between October 2015 and April 2016, we included patients offered interventional GI endoscopic treatment from twelve years and above.Informed consent was obtained from the patient or the guardian and assent obtained from patients below 18yrs.Consecutive sampling was used.Preformed data sheets were used to fill in collected valuables.Main outcome measures were interventional procedure offered, sedation modalities and immediate outcome of the procedure.The data was stored in a data base using SPSS® for windows v21.0 (Chicago, Illinois).Analysis was done using frequencies and descriptive statistics.

Results
The number of interventional GI endoscopies was 211(21.7%)out of the 972 endoscopies done.The median age group was 41-50 years with a range of 13 to 86 years.The male: female ratio was 1:0.9.There were more interventional endoscopies for the upper tract than the lower tract (23.1% and 5.2% respectively).Variceal band ligation, ERCP and esophageal stenting were the three common procedures respectively, Figure 1.The least done procedures were argon plasma coagulation, adrenaline injection and endoscopic haemostatic clip application for GI bleeding.Variceal hemostasis was the commonest procedure carried out up to the age of sixty years, after which ERCP and esophageal stenting were commonest.ERCP was twice frequently done in female as compared to males (M: F = 1:2).Distal common bile duct stricture was the commonest indication for ERCP, Table-1.Severe head injury (n=12) was the commonest cause of poor volitional intake requiring PEG fixation.Ten patients had medical co morbidities that included hypertension (n=7), diabetes mellitus (n=2) and deep venous thrombosis (n=1).Majority of patients (59.2%) received two combinations of medications for conscious sedation, midazolam and pethidine (Figure 2).Propofol and ketamine were used during ERCP infrequently as sedatives.Intravenous The ANNALS of AFRICAN SURGERY, January 2018 Volume 15 Issue 1 31 fluids and oxygen via nasal cannula were other supplemental therapies given during the procedures.Pulse oximetry and pulse rate were used as the sole monitoring variables in 74.9% of patients, table-2.Blood pressure monitoring was commonly done during ERCP.ERCP had the highest rate of non-completion at 33.3% (n=12).Failed ampullary cannulation and pyloric obstruction were among the technical difficulties encountered.Over sedation (n=1) and continuous bleeding (n=1) were recorded as complications.There were no luminal perforations and no mortalities that were recorded during the period of study.Patients who were on sequential EVBL tolerated well the procedure and did not require any sedation.Digital pulse oximeter was affixed to majority of patients during the procedure.Blood pressure monitoring with a brachial cuff was done for complex and lengthy procedures.Indications for oxygen supplementation were elderly age and oxygen saturations less than 90%.
No electrocardiographic monitoring was carried out during the procedure.Over sedation and continuous bleeding were recorded as adverse events.Over sedation occurred in patients who received multiple doses of two or more sedatives and were managed by oxygen supplementation and monitoring by a recovery nurse until fully awake.One patient had continuous bleeding from duodenal ulcer.Argon plasma coagulation and adrenaline injection were employed with hemostasis.Later in the ward the patient had continued hematemesis and was taken to theatre for laparotomy where the bleeding vessel was over sewn.There were no luminal perforations and no mortalities that were recorded during the period of study.With adequate skill and preparation, interventional endoscopy has minimal complications that can be managed with good outcome.

Conclusion
Our report describes application of interventional endoscopy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases with acceptable immediate outcome.This may increase awareness among clinicians, promote more training and advocacy in health policy with the sole aim of improving standards of gastroenterology healthcare in our set up.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Variety of interventional GI endoscopic procedures