Annals of Humanities and Development Studies

The AJOL site is currently undergoing a major upgrade, and there will temporarily be some restrictions to the available functionality.
-- Users will not be able to register or log in during this period.
-- Full text (PDF) downloads of Open Access journal articles will be available as always.
-- Full text (PDF) downloads of subscription based journal articles will NOT be available
We apologise for any inconvenience caused. Please check back soon, as we will revert to usual policy as soon as possible.

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT Open Access  DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT Subscription or Fee Access

A Critique of Rawlsian Egalitarian Liberalism

LM Manyeli


The problem I address is that of the distribution of wealth for which John Rawls proposes a solution in his theory of justice as fairness. I argue that the nature of Rawls’ two principles of justice is such that they are irreconcilable. The thrust of the essay is that, strictly speaking, Rawls is not an egalitarian. The lexical order of his two principles of justice is such that he cannot be an egalitarian. I argue that while Rawls’ liberalism is in fact not egalitarian, in vain does Rawls attempt to prove that it is egalitarian. That is why he finds himself caught in committing the fallacy of inconsistency.

Full Text:

No subscription journal articles available during site upgrade.

AJOL African Journals Online