Assessing unmet anaesthesia need in Sierra Leone: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized, cross-sectional, countrywide survey

  • MJ Harris
  • TB Kamara
  • E Hanciles
  • C Newberry
  • SR Junkins
  • NL Pace
Keywords: unmet anaesthesia, cluster-randomized, cross-sectional, countrywide survey.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the unmet anaesthesia need in a low resource region.
Introduction: Surgery and anæsthesia services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are under-equipped, under- staffed, and unable to meet current surgical need. There is little objective measure as to the true extent and nature of unmet need. Without such an understanding it is impossible to formulate  solutions. Therefore, we re-examined Surgeons OverSeas (SOSAS) unmet surgical need data to  extrapolate unmet anaesthesia need.
Methods: For the untreated surgical conditions identified by SOSAS, we assigned anaesthetic technique required to carry out the procedure. The chosen anaesthetic was based on common practice in the region. Procedures were categorized into minimal anaesthesia, spinal anæsthesia, regional anaesthesia,  ketamine/monitored anaesthesia care (MAC), and general endotracheal anæsthesia (GETA).
Discussions: Ninety-two per cent (687 of 745) of untreated surgical conditions in Sierra Leone would require some form of anaesthesia. Seventeen per cent (125 of 745) would require MAC, 22% (167 of 745) would require spinal anaesthesia, and 53% (395 of 745) would require GETA.
Conclusion: Analyses such as this can provide guidance as to the rational and efficient production and  distribution of personnel, drugs and equipment.

Keywords: unmet anaesthesia, cluster-randomized, cross-sectional, countrywide survey.

Published
2015-09-10
Section
Articles

Journal Identifiers


eISSN: 1680-6905