Article Sidebar
Article Details
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Diagnostic relevance of osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase as markers of bone turnover in Sickle Cell Anaemia: A Zaria study
Abstract
Background: Sickle cell anaemia (SCA) significantly contributes to skeletal morbidity in Nigeria, with bone complications like pain crises and avascular necrosis prevalent. Osteocalcin (OC) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) are potential markers of bone formation, yet their diagnostic utility in SCA is underexplored in African populations.
Objective: To assess serum OC and BALP levels in Nigerian SCA patients during bone pain crises (BPC), steady state, and in healthy controls, evaluating their diagnostic relevance for bone turnover.
Methods: This cross-sectional study at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, enrolled 180 adults (60 SCA in BPC, 60 steady state, 60 HbAA controls). Serum OC and BALP were measured via ELISA. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests, Spearman’s correlation, and ROC curves (p≤0.05).
Results: Median OC and BALP levels were significantly higher in SCA BPC (26.53 ng/mL, 23.51 μg/L) and steady state (24.40 ng/mL, 14.42 μg/L) compared to controls (16.07 ng/mL, 9.95 μg/L; p=0.022, p<0.001). BALP showed superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0.789, sensitivity=98.3%) compared to OC (AUC=0.592). OC correlated with BMI (p=0.020), but not age or gender.
Conclusion: BALP is a more reliable marker than OC for detecting bone turnover alterations in SCA, particularly during BPC, supporting its use in resource-limited settings.
Keywords: SCA; osteocalcin; BALP; bone turnover.
