Impact of structured education on glucose control and hypoglycaemia in Type-2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Evidence for the use of structured education in diabetes management is accumulating and has shown positive influence in the management of Type-2 diabetes. Objective: To assess the impact of structured education on glucose control and hypoglycaemia in the management of Type-2 diabetes. Methods: A systematic review was done using Medline via Ovid and EMBASE databases of published English literature between 1980 and 2014. Included studies were randomized control trials that assessed the impact of structured education on glucose control and hypoglycaemia. Results: Out of the 12,086 full text articles were identified, 36 full text articles were finally considered for this review after applying both inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 34 were exclusively on the effect of structured diabetes education on glucose control whilst 2 were studies on the effects of structured diabetes education on glucose control and hypoglycaemia. Majority of the studies included a predominant Caucasian population. There was heterogeneity in the included studies such as intervention methods and intensity as well as follow up periods. Group based education was preferred over individual education by most studies. Overall, most of the studies showed a significant positive effect on glycaemic control compared with control groups. One study showed a significant impact of structured education on hypoglycaemia. Conclusion: Structured education has positive impact on glucose control and hypoglycaemia in Type-2 diabetes and must be incorporated in routine care.


INTRODUCTION
][4] Structured Education in Diabetes Management (SEDM) helps ensure that the adaptation by the client is interwoven seamlessly with minimal disruption as possible to his/her daily routines.3][4][5] The set of new coping skills focuses on dealing with both acute and chronic complications. 3,4,6 Wst diabetes education has always been part of diabetes management since the 1930's 7,8 , it became more structured only a couple of decades ago and evidence for its effectiveness is gradually accumulating.Consequently, the content, structure and mode of delivery of such SEDM is constantly been reviewed with new evidence from research outcomes. 9An evidenced based curriculum will therefore also provide a basis for reimbursement of claims to a very great extent.Any structured education course content should be flexible, comprehensive, relevant to client's clinical and psychological needs and adaptable to a client's educational and cultural background. 10][4][5][6] The evidence for the usefulness of SEDM has been growing over the years.These include positive impact on self-confidence, understanding of the disease, selfmanagement, dealing with acute complications, impact on glycaemic control, chronic complications as well as cost-effectiveness. 4,11][14][15][16][17] The landmark trials of Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) targeted intensive glycaemic control and employed selfeducation as a key strategy in achieving their endpoints. 18,19 nfortunately, despite this growing evidence on the usefulness of SEDM, many caregivers all over the world, especially in the developing world, do not offer SEDM.It is also not reimbursed in many places that have instituted it. 20is report specifically seeks to find out the current evidence for the effectiveness of SEDM on glucose control and hypoglycaemia.It is hoped this result from this review would add to the evidence of the effectiveness of SEDM in Type-2 diabetes; and serve to encourage more caregivers to incorporate SEDM in their routine care.

METHODS
This systematic review focused on literature search from the period January 1980 to September 2014 of published randomized controlled trails in English language using MEDLINE via Ovid and EMBASE databases.The review process followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. 21clusion criteria included randomized control trials that assessed the impact of SEDM on glycaemic control (HBA1c) and hypoglycaemia in Type-2 diabetes.Included studies must have participants aged 18 years and above and published between January 1980 and September 2014.The exclusion criteria included studies published in a language other than English, among subjects with other types of diabetes including Type-1 diabetes, published before January 1980 and also among diabetes subjects less than 18 years old.

Search Strategy
A structured search of medical literature published in English Language between January 1980 and September 2014 was conducted using the Cardiff University electronic databases MEDLINE via Ovid and EMBASE.
The medical subject headings (MeSH) Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetes Education were searched and combined.Selected and included sub-headings from the search were Type-2 diabetes, diabetes complications, patient education, structured education, health education and self-care.The results of this combination were systematically combined with: 1. Glucose control (with selected sub-headings such as Type-2 diabetes, blood glucose, diabetes mellitus, haemoglobin A, haemoglobin a1C, glycated haemoglobin, glycosylated haemoglobin, hypoglycaemic agents, adults) and 2. Hypoglycaemia (with selected sub-headings such as low blood glucose, blood, complications, diagnosis, classification, epidemiology, history, mortality, prevention, control, therapy and physiopathology) respectively.Relevant references of searched articles were also evaluated for inclusion if not found in the electronic database.

Study Selection
All the results of the search were subsequently saved and initial screening done by reading the title of papers to include or exclude them.Papers that were found not to be relevant to the subject of the review were excluded at this stage.Subsequently, abstracts of remaining papers were read to exclude irrelevant ones.The remaining papers were saved for full text consideration.Papers that gave only access to abstracts were also excluded, as they did not provide sufficient information to assess the validity of the study.Manual search of the references of saved full text articles was done to identify and include any relevant paper that may have been missed during the electronic search.Only randomized control trials in subjects with Type-2 diabetes were selected, as they tend to support maximum validity and causal inferences.

Data extraction
Selected studies were divided into two main groups.Group 1 were randomized control trials that assessed the impact of structured diabetes education on glycaemic/glucose control, whilst Group 2 was randomized control trials that assessed the impact on hypoglycaemia.The type of structured education was irrespective of the provider delivering it, whether individual or group based and could involve any medium including oral, written, video, computer, multimedia messaging or Internet based.Consideration of studies did not also include duration of disease, severity of diabetes, presence of other co-morbidities, frequency or intensity as well as duration of interventions.Included variables were name of first author, publication year, demographic characteristics, country of study, methods (study design, sample size, participant selection), and results (outcome measures and conclusions).
If more than one pre-defined follow up intervals were used, only the last follow up was considered in the analyses.The main outcomes measures were: • To ascertain the change in glucose control (HBA1c) at baseline compared with the end of the intervention period.• To ascertain the change in episodes of hypoglycaemia at baseline compared with the end of the intervention period.Studies that assessed both of these outcomes were included if the impact could be assessed separately.

Data synthesis and analysis
Using the PRISMA guidelines as a guide 21 , the results of the search were summarized into a flow chart (Figure 1).Also, the selected studies were summarized and the various variables indicated above set up in a tabular form (refer Appendix 1 & 2).

Quality assessment of the studies: Strength of evidence and Risk of bias
Individual studies were assessed for quality based on the Cochrane recommendations and methodology using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) profiler software version 3.6.1. 22The study design and internal validity were also considered.Internal validity was measured by risk of bias including selection, performance, attrition and detection biases.Other considered significant contributors to the quality of studies were inconsistencies, indirectness and imprecision. 23,24 he studies were graded as high, moderate, low or very low in quality.

RESULTS
Searching through the English Literature, 36 full text articles were finally considered for this review, of which 34 were exclusively on the effect of structured diabetes education on glucose control whilst two were studies on the effects of structured diabetes education on both glucose control and hypoglycaemia.In all, 27,086 full text articles were identified from both the MEDLINE via Ovid and EMBASE databases with 13,799 from the former and 13,287 from the latter.
After titles were screened, 8,222 were excluded leaving 18,864 papers for abstract review and of which 12, 996 were considered ineligible and 34 as duplicates leaving a total of 5,834 for full text consideration.35 articles from full text review and 1 from searching references of articles eventually met the inclusion criteria and were considered for the systematic review as shown by Fig-ure 1.Each author was responsible for extracting data from half of the selected articles and results were exchanged and vetted by the other person.Discrepancies were resolved through consensus.

Effect of Structured Education on Glucose control and Hypoglycaemia
Thirty-six full-text articles altogether satisfied both the inclusion and exclusion criteria and are summarized in Appendix 1 & 2. Seventeen of the studies (17/36) were of European origin with a predominant Caucasian population; nine studies were from Unites States of America (USA), 7 from Asia and the rest from other parts of the world (Appendix 1).In total, 11,884 subjects were involved in all the studies with an age range of 18-90 years and majority of them had Type-2 diabetes for over 12 months.One study by Davies et al 13 involved patients newly diagnosed with Type-2 diabetes.Subjects were mostly recruited from General practices and community clinics (Appendix 1).
The period of the intervention ranged from a few days up to several months, whilst the follow up period varied from weeks to up to four years.The intervention and mode of delivery were varied.Most of the studies used group-based education, whilst a few were one-on-one.The instructors were mainly diabetes nurse educators trained to deliver those specific interventions whilst a few studies involved peer educators as well as lay health educators (Appendix 1).The medium of instruction and education were very varied and these included talks, telephone, short messaging service (SMS), Internet based, audio-visuals and printed materials as well as home visits.Again, in most of the studies, the educational methods were interactive, and participants were actively involved in the learning process by way of oral or written feedback, text messaging, videos, discussions and role plays.Most of the control methods were either Usual Care or Waiting list control methods (where control subjects were given the intervention methods at study end or assigned time after the study had begun).Overall, most of the studies (20 out of 36) showed a significant positive effect on glycaemic control compared with control groups (Appendix 1).The rest of the studies showed no difference after correcting for confounders, though on their own, despite the lack this significant difference, a lot of the intervention groups showed a tendency towards improved glycaemic controls (Appendix 1).Though studies 2,3,23 [25][26][27] , Appendix 1, showed significant differences in glycaemic outcomes between the intervention and control groups in the short term (6-8 months), at the end of the follow up periods (12-18 months), there was no difference between the two groups.
With respect to the studies on hypoglycaemia, a total of 1511 subjects were involved in the 2 studies drawn from the USA and China.In the first study 28 , Study 1, Appendix 2, the intervention lasted six weeks involving the use of a community-based, peer-led diabetes selfmanagement programme.After six months, there was a significant improvement in the symptoms of hypoglycaemia compared to controls.The second study 29 , Study 2, Appendix 2, involved insulin treated Type-2 diabetes patients who had been on two or more oral agents 29 .After 16 weeks of follow up, there was no difference in overall incidence of hypoglycaemic events in the two groups (education and control groups were 2.28 and 1.75 episodes per person-year, respectively (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION
Overall, majority of the studies demonstrated a significant impact of SEDM on glucose control.With respect to hypoglycaemia, the study by Lorig et al 28 (Appendix 2) showed a significant positive impact of SEDM on hypoglycaemia whilst the second by Guo et al 29 (Appendix 2), did not show any significant difference between the control and intervention groups at the end of the follow up period.Apart from glucose control and hypoglycaemia, many studies also assessed the impact of SEDM on lifestyle practices; self-care (diet, physical exercise, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), knowledge, psychological state, weight loss, blood pressure, lipid control etc.These other aspects were not considered under this review.

Structured Educational Methods
Professionals with varied backgrounds delivered the interventions in the various studies.They were mainly nurse educators and practice nurses, whilst others included community health workers, dieticians, trained pharmacists, lay health as well as peer educators.In one study (Appendix 1), an Endocrinologist was involved. 30he course content, methods employed and the duration of training employed in preparing these professionals to deliver the intervention also differed considerably, and were not even stated in some of the studies.The actual intervention methods employed, duration of intervention, frequency of reviews, overall contact time and follow up periods also varied considerably from weeks to several months.The study by Trento et al 31 had a total follow up period of 4 years.
The objective of most of the interventions was to promote self-management of diabetes based on the 'theory of empowerment', which emphasizes that the acquisition of knowledge does not automatically lead to behaviour change. 32Rather, by employing motivational and goal-directed skill teaching (which may be practical, physical, conceptual, social, emotional or personal), greater and longer lasting effects are likely to be achieved and sustained. 32All these differences in the methodology are likely to affect outcomes, their interpretation and generalizability.

Structured Diabetes Management Education on Glucose control
Majority of the studies (55%) summarized in Appendix 1 25,29,31,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] demonstrated a positive significant effect of the various forms of SEDM on glycaemic control compared to controls.Within this group, most of the interventions were group based; however individual intervention methods were used in seven of the studies. 35,39,41,42 45 48,50Early studies on the effect of diabetes education on glycaemic control were inconsistent; however later meta-analyses on this subject have demonstrated a tendency towards improved glycaemic control 5,12,16 , especially when the use of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) became widely available.Good glycaemic control if achieved early in the course of diabetes delays the onset and progression of microvascular complications. 18,19 n the landmark DCCT study, patient training and education about diabetes and its treatment as well as supporting their self-management efforts to improve their glycaemic control was keenly emphasized throughout the duration of the trial. 19Core to this approach was the use of multidisciplinary team consisting of at least one healthcare practitioner or educator such as a registered nurse or nutritionist. 19The findings of both the DCCT and Nurse case management study by Aubert et al 51 suggest that maximal effects of diabetes education are achieved when it is interwoven in routine diabetes care.The latter was a randomized controlled trial that used a 12-hour education programme.The combined medical and education case management approach led to greater improvements in glycaemic control (HbA1c 1.1%) compared with controls who received usual care. 51gradual shift from the traditional didactic approach to education in the 1970's to 1980's to group empowerment based education in the 1990's has being recognized over the years. 52Some of the advantages of group based education include increased cost-effectiveness especially in the setting of limited resources; increased overall contact time and sharing and learning from experiences of individual members of the group. 53The effectiveness of group based structured diabetes education was demonstrated by Deakin et al 49  In a meta-analysis, there was a significant reduction in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and body weight among the intervention group. 49lso, there was a reduced need for medications and an improvement in diabetes knowledge. 49ly one study by Davies et al from the UK 13 , had participant Type-2 diabetes patients who were newly diagnosed; the rest of the studies had subjects with established Type-2 diabetes for usually over 1 year (Appendix 1).In this self-management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed Type-2 diabetes, at the end of the intervention, HbA1c levels at 12 months had decreased by 1.49% in the intervention group compared with 1.21% in the control group.After adjusting for baseline and cluster, the difference was not significant:0.05% (95% confidence interval −0.10% to 0.20%).The intervention group also showed a greater weight loss: −2.98 kg (95% confidence interval −3.54 to −2.41) compared with 1.86 kg (−2.44 to −1.28), P=0.027 at 12 months. 13 is noteworthy, that some of the studies that involved minority populations were adapted to make it culturally acceptable and in some instances, delivered in a language better understood by the minority population. 33,35,36,41,43,44Culturally appropriate and contextrelevant interventions have been found to delay the onset of diabetes and prevent its complications. 54The Healthcare Commission, UK, in 2007 55 , reported that persons of Black and ethnic minority populations considered the need for structured education a priority and were prepared to attend one.However, only 11% of people had ever been offered one.If adaptations are made to these education programmes to suit these minority ethnic populations (who incidentally have the greatest burden of Type-2 diabetes), the inequality in access is likely to be improved and also make the education more cost-effective. 55e studies by Samuel-Hodge et al 56 , Cooper at al 26 and Goudswaard et al 27 did not show a significant difference in glycaemic at the end of the follow up period (12-18 months); however, interim analyses (6-8 months) did demonstrate statistically significant improvement in glucose control the intervention group compared to controls.Diabetes is a life-long disease, and like many chronic illnesses, the patient must be empowered to take control of their condition on a long-term basis.The diminishing effects of some of these interventions in diabetes with longer follow-up intervals have been demonstrated in the past. 57Contact time was the only significant predictor of improved glycaemic control in a previous meta-analysis on structured diabetes selfmanagement education by Norris et al 58

in 2002.
Also, a large meta-analysis showed that the effect of SEDM are not sustained beyond 4 months 59 , however another study by Padgett et al 5 found that dietary education had the largest effect size on glucose control with relaxation techniques being the weakest.In an Italian study by Trento et al 31 , 815 non-insulin-treated T2D patients with more than one year diabetes duration were randomized into intervention and control groups, with the control group receiving seven one-hour educational sessions over two years and repeated.This form of education (REMEO) involved mainly group work, handson activities, problem solving, real-life simulations, and role-playing.Total follow up was 4 years.The control group received usual care.At study end of the four years, there was lower HbA1c in the intervention group (7.3 ±0.9 vs. 8.8± 1.2%) with an adjusted mean difference of -1.49 (CI, -1.63, -1.34), p<0.001; and improvements in other psychological and metabolic parameters.Sperl-Hillen et al 60 in their study, assessed whether diabetes self-management education for patients would result sustained outcomes .The randomized controlled trial had over 600 adult Type-2 diabetes involved with HbA1c >7%; the conventional individual education (but not group education) had significant improvements in self-efficacy and reduced diabetes distress compared with usual care. 17However, it was observed that there were improvements in HbA1c, nutrition, and physical activity in the short-term but these gains were not sustained.The authors concluded that patients with Type-2 diabetes would require ongoing reinforcement to achieve lasting behavioural change and glucose control. 60e could infer that, to achieve clinically meaningful effects, there should be adequate time spent with clients to maintain improved glycaemic control.This would require a lot of resources, both human and material to implement and sustain such interventions.With meagre healthcare budgets around the world especially in developing countries, this would indeed prove a herculean task.Compounding this, is the reluctance of insurance companies to re-imburse costs of diabetes education 20 , and therefore more advocacy and evidence is needed to convince such companies to change their attitudes.Associated with such interventions is a high attrition rate. 58In the ROMEO study described above 31 , only 592 participants out of the 815 (72.6%) who started, completed the trial at the end of the 4 years.It takes a lot of resources, careful planning and execution to sustain interest among the subjects to achieve desired outcomes. 53n the real world, the ability to sustain this interest among patients is even more crucial because the prevailing conditions are difficult as well as different from the 'ideal' created by the experimental conditions. 58

Structured Diabetes Management Education on Hypoglycaemia
The first of the studies that assessed the impact of SEDM on hypoglycaemia was by Lorig et al from the USA. 28This was a peer-led diabetes self-management programme for participants with Type-2 diabetes from churches and senior centres.The programme was highly interactive with emphasis placed on planning and problem solving by incorporating skill building, goals setting, reinforcement and self-efficacy.At six months, intervention participants did not demonstrate significant improvements in A1C as compared with controls (p>0.05);however there were significant improvements in symptoms of hypoglycaemia, depression, communication with physicians, healthy eating, and reading food labels at 6 months (P < 0.01). 28The second study on hypoglycaemia from this review was by Guo et al from China. 29Nurses delivered the SEDM to insulin treated Type-2 diabetes patients.At 6 weeks follow up; there was no difference in the overall incidence of hypoglycaemic events in intervention groups compared with controls (p>0.05).
Like most systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials in the past 16,57 , the impact of SEDM on hypoglycaemia have not been thoroughly and rigorously assessed.It is a truism that generally, the incidence and severity tend to be more in Type-1 diabetes than in Type-2.However, among Type-2 patients those on insulin therapy, sulphonylyurea, old age group, long duration of diabetes, some concomitant medications, renal impairment, hypoglycaemia unawareness, and cognitive dysfunction among others are some of the risk factors for hypoglycaemia.On the contrary, whilst the lack of rigorous literature may give the false impression that hypoglycaemia in Type-2 diabetes is without risks, there are possible negative effects.These include short-term effects of enhanced counter regulatory hormonal effects and neuroglycopaenia such as irritability, confusion, and in severe cases stupor, coma, and even death. 61Long term effects of hypoglycaemia may include reduced working capacity, weight gain, loss of self-confidence with reduced quality of life, and increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. 61It is obvious that these are not without costs to the patient, society at large and the healthcare system.SEDM therefore becomes a useful tool for educating both patients and healthcare professionals to improve their awareness, recognition and management of hypoglycaemia.The appropriate use of glucose lowering medications with lower risk of hypoglycaemia even become more paramount. 61me limitations were noted.The search was based on English-language literature and also not from all available search engines and there might have excluded some possible useful studies.However, this former potential effect above might be limited according to Moher et al 62 who found out that only 2% overestimated treatment effect occur in language-inclusive studies.There may be other important studies with different study designs on this subject, which may have been excluded.There were internal validity concerns with respect to selection, performance, attrition, and detection biases.The greatest concern was with concealment of allocation and blinding, with are difficult to ensure in this type of study design and subjects.
The review concentrated on the effect of SEDM on glucose control and hypoglycaemia, excluding other important outcomes like self-care behaviours, attitudes and psychological effects; which frequently have important influences on the overall outcomes in the life of Type-2 diabetes patients. 58

CONCLUSION
This review has once again brought to the fore, the importance of SEDM as an integral part in the management of Type-2 diabetes.It showed an overall positive impact of SEDM on both glucose control and hypoglycaemia.
Included studies were randomized control trials which increases the acceptability and applicability of the findings of this review. 23Most of the studies used group based interventions which are likely to be cost-effective and offers greater opportunity for people to share experiences and behaviour change. 32What remains to be seen is whether these positive effects from SEDM are maintained in the long term.

Future research
It is hoped future research on the effectiveness of SEDM in Type-2 diabetes should be designed to evaluate the long-lasting effect of SEDM and whether initial short-term improvements in metabolic control, psychological attributes, coping mechanisms and self-care behaviours are sustained.
There should be greater efforts made to improve allocation concealment and blinding, a situation, which was difficult to achieve in many of the studies in this review.HbA1c was statistically different between the 2 groups at 4 (P = .007),8 (P = .009),and 12 months (P = .04).

Conclusion:
A structured group educational programme centred on self-management improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes attending a tertiary health Care facility (even if basal A1C levels are already <7%.Though there was loss of momentum at after 4 months, improvement lasts for up to 12 months.C: Standard support.All patients eventually had the empowerment education. Outcome measures: HbA1c, and a variety of quantitative, psychological and educational measures assessed at 6 months ('short-term') and 12 months ('long-term') post-intervention.
Benefits in HbA1c levels at 6 months follow-up among the intervention group compared to controls (p = 0.005), illness attitudes (p = 0.04), and perceived treatment effectiveness (p = 0.03).

Conclusion:
Benefits in glycaemic control in the short but not long term.No significant improvement was found in any of the primary or secondary outcomes, apart from a significant reduction in mean systolic (-4.65 mmHg, 95% CI 9.18 to -0.12; P = 0.04) and diastolic blood pressure (-3.30mmHg, 95% CI -5.35 to -1.26; P = 0.002).

Conclusion:
The reported effectiveness of group diabetes education offered by more highly trained professionals, in well-resourced settings, was not replicated in the present study 12 64 Mons U HbA1c (in %) decreased significantly from baseline to 12-month followup measurement both in the intervention (-0.44, p<o.oo1) and the usual care group (-0.51, p<0.001), but there was no significant between-group intervention effect.

Germany
Conclusions: Although we found no beneficial effect of the supportive telephone counselling in terms of a reduction of HbA1c above usual care, though other benefits accrued.The intervention group showed statistically significant increase in mean of knowledge, behaviour, physical and psychological health and also had a statistically significant reduction in mean of HbA1c.

Conclusion:
This interactive approach is useful and worthwhile behaviour modification and improvement in HbA1c and health-related quality of life of diabetic patients.
14 65 Ko GTC China 2005 T2D with poor glycaemic control were recruited from three regional diabetic centres in Hong Kong.Outcome measures included fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c , body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure and lipid profiles assessed at baseline and after 1 year.
There was a greater drop in HbA1c in the intervention group (6.0%) compared with control (2.1%) but when adjusted for age and gender there was no significant difference (p= 0.171).

Conclusions:
Regular structured reinforcement with diabetic health education useful helps to control more successfully some of the cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese Type 2 diabetic patients.
The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c levels at 6 months from baseline.
Conclusions: The SILE program that was provided in primary care settings for patients with type 2 diabetes resulted in greater improvement in HbA1c levels than usual diabetes care and education.
16 66 Moriyama M. C: Usual care PLUS a commercial textbook on diabetes.
Final outcomes were the improvement of the physiological data including HbA1c related to the prevention of complications and an improvement in the QOL.
Within groups, there was significant change in HBA1c values (p=o.ooo) over the follow up period compared with controls, which did not show such as change (p=0.448).However, over all, there was not statistical difference between the two groups (p=0.705)

Conclusion:
Self-management education works successfully in relation to patients' behaviour modification skills, degree of goal attainment, and selfefficacy, consequently improving their health outcomes.No differences in the primary outcomes between the groups at 12 months, but the control group had an increase in A1C of 0.3% points during follow-up.

Study
Sub group analysis for the quartile with the highest A1C at baseline (>7.7, n = 18 in both groups) revealed significant improvements within the intervention group at 12 month follow-up for both A1C and PAM and a trend for better outcome in the intervention group compared to the control Conclusions: The locally developed ongoing diabetes self-management education programs prevented an increase in A1C 18 68 Steed L. C: Delayed intervention.
The main clinical outcome HbA1c, which was measured at baseline and 3 months.
There was greater reduction in HBA1c at 3 months compared to baseline in the intervention group compared with control.However, the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant.
There was however a significant impact of dietary behaviours, exercise and SMBG etc.

Conclusion:
DSMP showed significant improvement relative to controls on selfmanagement behaviours, quality of life and illness beliefs and a trend towards improved HbA1c.C: 2-year waiting list.
Main outcome was HbA1c at 6, 12, and 24 months and a questionnaire was administered at baseline and final follow-up.
Intervention programme significantly decreased HbA1c by 0.4% at 24 months after baseline (P=0.008).There was a significant drop but a worsening at 6 and 12 months respectively.

Conclusion:
Experience-based group education was effective in decreasing participants' HbA1c 1-year after completed intervention.Early effect of the intervention was followed by relapse after 12 months and a new, significant decrease at 24 months.C: Usual care: delayed intervention.
The main outcome was to assess the impact education on metabolic profile: HbA1c, FBS, post-prandial glucose, urine glucose and lipid profile at the end of 8 weeks.
HbA1c significantly decreased by 2% in the experimental group compared with controls of 0.1% (p<0.05).There were also significant drop in FBS, post-prandial glucose and lipid profile in favour of the experimental group.
Conclusion: regular and repetitive education provided by the nurses had a positive effect on the metabolic values of persons with DM.

43
Telle-Hjellset V.However, at 18 months there were no significant differences for HbA1c, number of patients with HbA1c < 7.0%, or number treated with insulin.

Conclusion:
Education was effective in improving glycaemic control and in delaying the need for insulin therapy in patients treated with maximal oral hypoglycaemic therapy in the short term but not up to 18 months after intervention.
24 69 Adolfsson At 1-year follow-up, the level of confidence in diabetes knowledge was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (p < 0.05).No significant differences were found in other outcome measures.

Conclusion:
The empowerment group education did improve patients' confidence in diabetes knowledge with maintained glycaemic control despite the progressive nature of the disease.Significance was lost in mixed models adjusted for baseline value and cluster-effects (adjusted mean difference -0.03 (95% CI -0.15; 0.09, p = 0.607).

Conclusion:
The Austrian DMP improves process quality and enhances weight reduction, but does not significantly improve metabolic control for T2D patients 30 47 Trouilloud D. Assess impact of Therapeutic education (TPE) on selfmanagement behaviours, perceived competence and HbA1c at 3 months compared to baseline.
Follow-up Scheffe comparisons showed that HbA1c significantly decreased in the TPE group (p < 0.001), whereas it remained stable in the control group (p = 0.55).

Conclusion:
The education programme resulted in positive changes in glycaemic control and self-management behaviours after three months follow-up.
31 14 Deakin T.A. C: Usual care PLUS diabetes education and review with prearranged individual appointments.
Primary outcome was change in HbA1c at baseline and 14 months.

Conclusion:
Participation in the X-PERT Programme by adults with Type 2 diabetes was shown at 14 months to have led to improved glycaemic control C: Usual care plus insulin therapy.
All of them discontinued OADs except biguanides and α-glucosidase inhibitors.
Primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline at 16 weeks.
Significant reductions in HbA1c from baseline in the education group compared with controls (2.16% vs. 2.08%; P < 0.05).Improvement in Morisky Medication Adherence Scale was greater in the education group (P < 0.05).
No difference in overall incidence of hypoglycaemic events in the two groups (education and control groups was 2.28 and 1.75 episodes per person-year, respectively (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:
Structured education can promote the ability of patients to self-manage and their compliance with medications, thereby achieving better outcomes Primary end point was A1c measure of 7 % or below during the last month or longer of enrolment.
There was a significant association between participation in the intervention and achieving a haemoglobin A1c measure of 7 % or below, chi squared = 5.983, p < .05.Based on the odds ratio, patients were 4.58 times more likely to reach the desired haemoglobin A1c target.

Conclusion:
The online diabetes self-management portal complemented by biweekly virtual visits with a nurse enabled 26 African Americans with diabetes to improve their health outcomes 35 50 Graziano JA.Automated Telephone Intervention consisting of daily, automated pre-recorded voice message relaying a short (less than 1 minute) message related to type 2 DM.Follow up period was for 9 months.
Primary end point was impact of intervention on HbA1c at 9 months.
Adjusted mean changes in the intervention and control groups were -1.13% and -1.10% respectively, with no significant difference between the two (p=0.89).

Conclusion:
No overall treatment effect was seen on change in HbA1c level.Primary outcomes include cognitive, psychological and metabolic impact including glycaemic control.

Conclusion:
ROMEO, a multicentre controlled trial, showed that group care is transferable and confirmed its efficacy.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow diagram of study selection based on the PRISMA 2009 guidelines If multiple interventions were used, studies were included only if the educational component could be examined separately.The information and characteristics from the included studies was summarized in a tabular form (Appendix 1 & 2).
in a Cochrane review in 2005 which included 11 studies with 1532 participants.
-centred supportive counselling intervention comprising monthly telephone-based counselling sessions by practice nurses over 12 months; sessions were conducted according to a written manual and were based on a standardized questionnaire.Follow-up-measurements were carried out after 6, 12 and 18 months C: Usual care The primary outcome was change in HbA1c-concentration after 12 (end-of-intervention) and 18 months (6 months postintervention).
10) interactive 2 hours weekly (for 4 weeks) health education program on knowledge, behaviour, HbA1c and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of diabetic patients PLUS printed copies of in country diabetes guidelines.Follow up was 4 months.C: Usual care To assess knowledge, behaviour change, Improvement in HbA1c and health related quality of life (HRQOL) at baseline and at 4 months.

N=180
structured 30 minutes reinforcement of diabetic health education by a trained nurse after the doctors' consultations every 3 months for 12 months.C: Same medical care except no nursing reinforcement.
based lifestyle education (SILE) program delivered by registered dieticians in 4 sessions at primary care clinical settings with randomization at the practice level with six month follow up.
month self-management education-<30 min of monthly motivational interviews based on the program's textbook and biweekly telephone calls from a nurse educator throughout the 12 months.
old and who had been to a GP consultation in the previous 3 years with no preset A1C cut-off values were referred to 2 hospitals N=146 (I=73, C=73) Mean Age=66 (40-75 years) I: Structured Education delivered by diabetes nurses lasts for 15 h over three sessions with 1-2 week between each session.C: Waiting list control PLUS usual care.Primary outcomes were A1C and patient activation measured with patient activation measure (PAM) at 6 and 12 months.
group-based structured Diabetes Self-management programme (DSMP) facilitated by diabetes specialist nurses and dieticians.Followed up for a total of 18 weeks with assessments at baseline (0 weeks), immediately post-intervention (6 weeks), and 3 months follow-up (18 weeks).
12-month long group experiencedbased educational program led by specially trained pharmacists, assisted by a diabetes nurse specialist on the first two occasions.Follow up period 24 months from baseline.
program consisted of three 40 minutes sessions delivered by nurse educators and three home visits of 30 minutes each; intervention occurred within 8 weeks after discharge from hospital, PLUS diabetes education brochure.
day programme by multiprofessional team including eight group sessions, each session lasting 2-3 hours.Sessions were interactive and patientcentred, and consisted of both educational and problem-solving activities.Follow up was 3 months.C: Usual care waiting list.
2-h weekly group sessions of structured self-management education PLUS Diabetes manual delivered by diabetes educators.Follow up to 14 months.
diabetes education, including 8 models and 3 telephone follow-ups (delivered by trained nurses) plus insulin therapy.Follow up was 16 weeks.
(by personal cellular phone) and internet (phone and computer based) intervention PLUS 4 meetings with endocrinologist.Follow up was 3 monthly for 1 year.C: Usual care PLUS 4 meetings with endocrinologist.Primary end point was % change in plasma glucose at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.HbA1c decreased 1.22 percentage points at 3 months, 1.09 percentage points at 6 months, 1.47 percentage points at 9 months, and 1.49 percentage points at 12 months compared with baseline in the intervention group (all time points, p < 0.05).The percentage change in the control group was, however, not significant.Conclusion:This web-based intervention using SMS of personal cellular phone and Internet improved HbA1c and 2HPPT at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months in patients with obese type 2 diabetes.bi-weekly internet based diabetes education programme by diabetes nurse educators.Follow up was 9 months.C: Usual care.
1-h sessions were held over 2 years and repeated.Education (ROMEO) involved mainly group work, hands-on activities, problem solving, real-life simulations, and role-playing.Total follow up was 4 years.C: Routine individual visits (Usual care)

Summary of studies on Effects of Structured Education on Glucose control in Type 2 Diabetes Study No
centric, provider-assisted diabetes telehealth selfmanagement intervention for urban minorities.Perspect Health Inf Manag.2011;1(8).APPENDIX 1: