PROMOTING ACCESS TO AFRICAN RESEARCH

HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies

Log in or Register to get access to full text downloads.

Remember me or Register



The AJOL site will be undergoing a major upgrade over the next couple of days.

During this period there will temporarily be some restrictions to the available functionality.
  • Users will not be able to register or log in during this period.
  • downloads of full text (PDF) subscription based journal articles will NOT be available
  • full text (PDF) downloads of Open Access journal articles will be available as always
We apologise for any inconvenience caused. Please check back soon, as we will revert to usual policy as soon as possible.

“2 Corinthians 11:22: Historical context, rhetoric, and ethnicity”

D Duling

Abstract




In this article historical criticism, rhetorical criticism and ethnicity theory are combined to interpret Paul's boasting about his ethnicity in 2 Corinthians 11:22. Partition theory helps to establish the historical/social context that 2 Corinthians 10-13 is a fragment of the “tearful letter,” which represented the low point (high conflict) of Paul's relations with the Corinthians. Rhetoric – the theatrical “Fool's Speech,” which contains irony, self-praise, and comparison – helps to understand Paul's boastful argumentation in his selfdefence;
and ethnicity theory helps to interpret Paul's construction of his ethnic identity. Paul boasted of his ethnicity by taking up rhetorical comparison and self-praise. But he did so in the so-called “Fool's Speech”, which is full of irony: his ethnic heritage was part
of his argument that he was equal to that of his opponents, but – here is the chief irony – his ethnicity “in the flesh” ultimately meant nothing to him.

HTS Theological Studies Vol. 64 (2) 2008: pp. 819-84



AJOL African Journals Online