https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/issue/feed Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The) 2026-10-14T15:15:27+00:00 Dr. Damilola S. Olawuyi (Executive Director) dolawuyi@ogeesinstitute.edu.ng Open Journal Systems <p><em>The Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy</em> (JSDLP) is Nigeria’s first interdisciplinary&nbsp;sustainable development journal, published by the OGEES Institute, Afe Babalola University, Nigeria.&nbsp;The journal fosters the dissemination of research results and scholarly papers by teaching and&nbsp;research scholars in Africa and across the world in the area of sustainable development law and&nbsp;policy. The OGEES Institute publishes two issues per year.</p> <p>The thematic focus of the journal span across broad areas of sustainable development law and policy&nbsp;ranging from the economic, social and environmental dimensions. As such papers that explore broad&nbsp;themes of sustainable development such as environment, natural resources, green economy,&nbsp;international trade, banking, taxation, public policy, public private partnerships, alternative dispute&nbsp;resolutions, peace, and conflict studies are normally given top consideration. The Editorial Board of&nbsp;the Journal comprises international development scholars and experts from Italy, United Kingdom,&nbsp;Indonesia, Nigeria, Canada and the United States that provide leadership and lend their expertise to&nbsp;promote and enhance the scholarly relevance of the journal.&nbsp;</p> <p>Other websites associated with this journal: <a title="http://www.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/research-publications" href="http://www.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/research-publications" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/research-publications</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a title="http://www.abuad.edu.ng" href="http://www.abuad.edu.ng" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.abuad.edu.ng</a></p> https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338768 From Form to Function: Enforcement-Centred Reforms for Sustainable Corporate Governance 2026-10-14T13:26:43+00:00 Anil Karki info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>The substantial “enforcement gap” in the developing country’s capital markets<br>makes them less trustworthy. This is because corporate governance rules that are<br>formally adopted do not actually function. This research article contends that the<br>primary issue is not about a lack of laws but it an insufficiency of enforcement<br>capability. It is, therefore, presented in this article that an integrated, four-pillar<br>enforcement architecture is the basis for sustainable corporate governance reforms<br>by going beyond the usual focus on legislative form. This article employs a doctrinal<br>and comparative policy analysis to look at how the four-pillars that follow function<br>together: regulatory design (Pillar 1), which strategically combines voluntary codes<br>along with mandatory rules; supervisory regulation (Pillar 2), which requires<br>independent and powerful securities regulators; adjudicatory capacity (Pillar 3),<br>which includes specialised courts and strong arbitration; and market discipline<br>(Pillar 4), which is driven by institutional investors as well as a free media. The<br>analysis shows that these components cannot function on their own as they<br>function together as a unified functionary. If one of them fails, the whole<br>enforcement framework could fall apart. The article finds that sustainable corporate<br>governance is an exercise in institutional transformation as it requires a contextspecific, sequenced strategy that strengthens the connections within this<br>framework. It concludes that it is only by the means of such a comprehensive<br>process for the sustainable corporate governance that the developing countries can<br>move from reform in form towards reform in function, and consequently<br>effectively protecting minority shareholders, generating long-term investment, and<br>achieving market confidence.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338769 Reinforcing Party Autonomy in India: Need For Legal Framework on Model Online Arbitration Rules (MOAR) 2026-10-14T13:30:34+00:00 Shraddha Shukla shraddha.shraddha@res.christuniversity.in Ipsita Ray ray.ipsita@christuniversity.in <p>Parties and their counsels to disputes in international trade and commerce<br>have been keenly observing the legal environment in India regarding the<br>progress of its arbitration regime. In recent times, offering technological<br>support to the settlement procedure has enhanced the parties’ ability to more<br>effectively manage their arbitration proceedings. The study thematically<br>reviews the rise of party autonomy principle in India and traces its<br>development from traditional form of arbitration to its modern context in<br>online arbitration. Further, by employing a doctrinal methodology, the paper<br>examines the legal validity of an online or technology-based arbitration<br>conducted in India. The findings of the study conclude that albeit, an entirely<br>online-based arbitration would be legally valid in India, there is an absence of<br>a consolidated legal framework to regulate such proceedings in the country.<br>Predictability and certainty in online proceedings would potentially enhance<br>the principle of party autonomy in India, thereby increasing its arbitration<br>friendliness. The study provides a justification on the need for model online<br>arbitration rules (hereinafter MOAR) in India while also referring to similar<br>rules drafted in jurisdictions like Sweden, China, and South Korea. The paper<br>also discusses potential issues that might arise while drafting online arbitration<br>rules for India, thus, providing a momentum towards initiating legal<br>discussions on the drafting of such rules.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338770 Brazilian National Determined Contributions: Current Challenges and Way Forward 2026-10-14T13:35:20+00:00 Eduardo G. Pereira info@ogeesinstitute.edu.ng Juliana Carvalho info@ogeesinstitute.edu.ng Dominique Mouette info@ogeesinstitute.org Danielle M.T. Denny info@ogeesinstitute.org Alexandre de Barros Gallo info@ogeesinstitute.org Maria Eduarda de Oliveira Rocha info@ogeesinstitute.org Alberto Fossa info@ogeesinstitute.org Edmilson Moutinho dos Santos info@ogeesinstitute.org Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>No Abstract.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338773 Adaptive Governance: Panacea for Discordance in the Kenyan Regulatory Framework on Zoonoses 2026-10-14T13:42:10+00:00 Susan Yara susanyara@uonbi.ac.ke Collins Odote c.odote@uonbi.ac.ke Robert Kibugi rmkibugi@uonbi.ac.ke <p>The emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic diseases globally has posed great<br>financial and health burdens over the years. Anthropogenic disturbances to the<br>environment have caused widespread ecosystem disruptions, increasing<br>interactions between humans and wildlife and exacerbating transmission of<br>zoonotic diseases. Recently, the COVID-19 outbreak renewed discussions on<br>interlinkages between human, animal, and environmental health. These<br>interlinkages evidence a complex relationship encompassing various disciplines<br>and actors, going beyond the traditional use of epidemiology to explain new<br>infections. However, the current Kenyan regulatory framework fails to recognize<br>the multidisciplinary nature of zoonoses, offering a siloed, discordant, and<br>fragmented framework. Ideally, dealing with zoonoses would need collaboration,<br>cooperation, and action from various actors in the social and ecological fields.<br>Based on literature review and doctrinal research, this paper argues for the<br>adoption of an adaptive governance framework underpinned within the Social<br>Ecological Systems (SES) theory as the appropriate regulatory design. Such a<br>framework as already implemented in countries such as Chile, lays the foundation<br>for mainstreaming environmental health into human and animal health governance<br>frameworks as well as fostering multidisciplinary approaches and collaborations<br>of stakeholders within the different disciplines.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338775 Towards an Efficient Regulatory Framework for Single-Use-Plastics in Nigeria 2026-10-14T13:46:53+00:00 Sylvanus Gbendazhi Barnabas barnabas.sylvanus@nileuniversity.edu.ng <p>Single-use plastics (SUPs) constitutes a critical environmental and regulatory<br>challenge in Nigeria. Although there are few relevant legislations, and policies such<br>as the National Policy on Plastic Waste Management 2020 and the National Policy<br>on Solid Waste Management 2020, there is poor implementation and enforcement.<br>Through a mainly doctrinal analysis, this article examines the challenges of SUPs<br>waste in Nigeria, evaluate the existing regulatory frameworks, highlights<br>international best practices, and proposes strategic reforms rooted in sustainability,<br>and compliance with global environmental standards. As a result of their progress<br>in the effective regulation of SUPs, the paper draws lessons from Sweden, the<br>Netherlands, EU, Rwanda and India. It highlights the importance of banning<br>harmful SUPs, enforcing corporate recycling targets and integrating informal<br>waste collectors into formal sectors. It also proposes key pathways such as<br>establishing plastic recovery hubs, implementing waste-to-energy projects and<br>incentivising eco-friendly products innovations. The role of government, industry<br>and civil society in achieving a sustainable circular economy for SUPs is<br>demonstrated. The findings suggest that a multi-stakeholder approach, supported<br>by strict regulations, financial incentives and behavioural change campaigns, can<br>transform SUPs into economic assets. If effectively implemented, a circular<br>economy model will reduce SUPs pollution, create green jobs and enhance<br>Nigeria’s environmental sustainability</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338777 Integrating the Paris Agreement and the SDGs In Domestic Law: A Legal Pathway for Coherent Climate–SDG Implementation in Nigeria 2026-10-14T13:50:09+00:00 Noah Afedolor Izuokumor info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>This article scrutinizes the fragmented implementation of Nigeria’s Nationally<br>Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable<br>Development Goals (SDGs). It argues that the absence of a coherent legal and<br>institutional framework remains the primary barrier to achieving both agendas<br>simultaneously. Existing scholarship identifies conceptual synergies between<br>climate change and the SDGs but offers limited guidance on how developing<br>countries can operationalize these linkages through domestic law, particularly in<br>Nigeria. The paper identifies key gaps. These include: (1) current policies recognize<br>synergies within the scope of climate change policy but do not extend to the SDGs;<br>(2) weak coordination among institutions continues to undermine<br>implementation. To address these gaps, the article makes two contributions. First,<br>it identifies three high-leverage alignment nodes: energy (SDG 7), land and forestry<br>(SDG 15), and food security (SDG 2). It explains how actions within these nodes<br>can advance NDC and SDG outcomes concurrently. Second, drawing on doctrinal<br>analysis and comparative insights from jurisdictions including Mexico, Costa Rica,<br>Japan, and South Korea, the article demonstrates how Nigeria can move from<br>fragmented implementation to a coherent national strategy that delivers joint gains<br>for both frameworks. The article proposes an integrated approach for aligning<br>NDC and SDG obligations, including policy integration, inter-agency<br>coordination with reporting duties to Parliament, multi-stakeholder engagement,<br>and the ring-fencing and redeployment of subsidy savings for projects that deliver<br>on both agendas.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338779 Addressing Regulatory Deficiencies: Enhancing Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria’s Extractive Industry through Local Informal Institutions 2026-10-14T13:55:08+00:00 Uchechukwu Nwoke u.nwoke@essex.ac.uk Godswill Agbaitoro g.agbaitoro@essex.ac.uk Comfort Tioluwani info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>The paper emphasises the importance of incorporating local informal institutions<br>into Nigeria's corporate social responsibility (CSR) frameworks, particularly in<br>regions like the Niger Delta. It underscores that recognising these communitybased organisations is vital for enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of CSR<br>initiatives. By fostering collaborative partnerships and establishing mechanisms for<br>engagement, companies can better align their CSR activities with the needs and<br>realities of local communities. The study advocates legislative reforms to make<br>CSR a mandatory requirement in Nigerian company law, obliging corporate<br>directors to recognise and collaborate with informal institutions. Additionally, it<br>proposes expanding the scope of corporate fiduciary duty to encompass<br>responsibilities towards local communities and environmental management. This<br>change would enable companies to act as drivers of positive change, benefiting<br>both their business interests and the well-being of local populations. Furthermore,<br>the paper highlights the potential of Impact and Benefit Agreements (IBAs) to<br>establish frameworks for social inclusion and to encourage the active participation<br>of local stakeholders in corporate decision-making.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338782 Examining Climate Change Litigation Approaches in Nigeria 2026-10-14T14:00:33+00:00 Taofeeq N. Alatise alatise.tn@unilorin.edu.ng <p>Climate change litigation is an important legal tool of climate change governance.<br>Across several jurisdictions, the increasing use of litigation to address critical<br>elements of climate change is redefining the obligation of states and corporate<br>entities. However, the successes of these cases have been largely influenced by the<br>legal approaches adopted by litigants in their filings and arguments in courts. The<br>application of these approaches by litigants and courts have provided basis for the<br>increasing use of litigation as a tool for seeking redress against the adverse impacts<br>of climate change. In the same manner, litigants in Nigeria are applying these legal<br>approaches to institute climate-related suits in courts. In this paper, we examine<br>these approaches and the extent to which they have been invoked by litigants and<br>courts. To achieve this, the paper adopts a doctrinal research approach for content<br>analysis of primary and secondary sources. The paper argues that constitutional<br>and human rights legal approaches have stronger potentials to promote access to<br>justice in climate litigation in Nigeria for two reasons: first, they impose legal<br>obligations on government and corporate entities. Second, they provide legal basis<br>for potential victims to seek redress in courts.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338783 Reconsidering the Right to Health and Wellbeing and the Challenge of Healthcare Delivery in Nigeria: Nigeria’s Trajectory Towards SDG3 by 2030 2026-10-14T14:04:14+00:00 Brown Etareri Umukoro beumukoro@delsu.edu.ng Ejiro T. Kore-Okiti ejiro.okiti@delsu.edu.ng <p>Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG3) aims to ensure healthy lives and promote<br>well-being for all ages by 2030. It focuses on the right to health which is a<br>fundamental human right at international law. This goal is premised on the fact<br>that good health is an essential pre-requisite for the persistent and adequate<br>functioning of every individual and every human society. The study uses doctrinal<br>methodology in engaging in a systematic analysis of primary legal sources like<br>relevant provisions of the Constitution, health statutes and judicial decisions. The<br>article provides a survey into Nigeria’s trajectory towards SDG3 amid persistent<br>challenges including the legal status of the right to health in Nigeria and inadequate<br>healthcare infrastructure, drawing from statutory frameworks like the<br>Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Health Act 2014 and<br>the National Health Insurance Authority Act 2022 as well as Nigeria’s behaviour<br>towards its healthcare obligations. It analyses gaps in policy implementation and<br>the challenge of funding for the purpose of drawing a conclusion whether Nigeria<br>is truly committed to the 2030 Sustainable Development Plan or just paying lip<br>service to the international community on the SDGs obligation on states.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338785 No Development in Darkness: The Role of the Nigerian Electricity Act 2023 in Advancing Selected Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria 2026-10-14T14:08:34+00:00 Oluchukwu Precious Obioma oluchukwu.obioma@unn.edu.ng Amarachi Remigius Dike amarachi.dike@unn.edu.ng Newman U. Richards newman.richards@unn.edu.ng <p>Nigeria's persistent electricity challenges have significantly hindered its progress in<br>sustainable development, affecting vital sectors such as education, healthcare, and<br>industry. This paper examines the role of the Nigerian Electricity Act 2023 in<br>advancing selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 1 (No<br>Poverty), SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being), SDG 4 (Quality Education), and<br>SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy). Using a doctrinal research approach, it<br>assesses the provisions of the Act, relevant constitutional principles, and<br>comparative legal instruments to evaluate their effectiveness in addressing Nigeria’s<br>long-standing electricity shortages. However, the findings indicate that although<br>the Act introduces progressive reforms—such as decentralisation of the electricity<br>sector, promotion of renewable energy, and the establishment of consumer<br>protection measures. However, implementation gaps, institutional weaknesses, and<br>infrastructural deficiencies continue to hinder the realisation of the targeted SDGs.<br>The paper contends that reliable electricity access is essential for poverty alleviation,<br>health service delivery, and educational outcomes, and therefore plays a central role<br>in Nigeria’s sustainable development. It recommends short-term measures<br>(strengthening regulatory agencies and enforcement), medium-term measures<br>(expanding the grid and investing in renewable energy), and long-term strategies<br>(full market liberalisation and universal access initiatives). The study concludes that<br>while the Electricity Act 2023 marks a step forward in aligning Nigeria with the<br>2030 Agenda, sustained political commitment, adequate financing, and<br>strengthened institutional capacity are vital to ensure that no Nigerian remains in<br>darkness.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338786 Nigeria’s Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023: Reform, Continuity, and the Quest For SDG 16 2026-10-14T14:18:10+00:00 David Tarh-Akong Eyongndi eyongndi18@gmail.com Garvin Ufuoma Oyibodoro garvinesquire@gmail.com Anselm Uchechukwu Abonyi barristeruchechukwu2002@gmail.com Agbaovwe Emmanuel Oturuhoyi info@ogeesinstitute.org Olasupo Bada olasupobada@gmail.com <p>Given the rise in disputes arising from domestic and trans-border commercial and contractual<br>agreements and the inherent challenges associated with litigation in resolving them, in 1988, Nigeria<br>enacted the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (ACA 1988) styled after the United Nations Committee<br>on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL Model Law). After several years, many developments in the<br>field of Alternative Disputes Resolution (ADR) have rendered the ACA, 1988 incapable of matchingup; therefore, resulting in clamour for its overhaul., The National Assembly in response, enacted the<br>Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023 (AMA 2023). This paper adopts doctrinal method in interrogating<br>whether the AMA 2023 in comparison to the erstwhile ACA 1988, is a revolutionary legislation or a<br>mere revision regarding the law and practice of arbitration. The article, on comparative basis, gauged the<br>innovations introduced by the AMA 2023 against the laws in jurisdictions like Ghana, South Africa,<br>Kenya, Hong Kong and Singapore aimed at gleaning reciprocal lessons for Nigeria The scope of this<br>inquiry is limited to the arbitration provisions of the AMA 2023.The article observed that, ADR is an<br>enabler of the Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG16) centred on peace, justice, strong institution<br>which the erstwhile ACA 1988 could not optimally achieve hence, it inquires whether the AMA 2023<br>promotes SDG 16. The article found that a survey of the AMA 2023 in comparison with the ACA 1988,<br>it contains novel provisions such as provision of immunity for arbitrator, consolidation and joinder of<br>parties, emergency arbitrator, enlarged limitation period, gender neutral language, etc., making it a<br>progressive or revolutionary legislative reform. Also, the article argues that AMA 2023 is a catalyst for<br>the actualisation of SDG 16 in Nigeria through purposive adoption and application. The article also<br>found that, in comparison to Ghana, Kenya, Hong Kong, Singapore and South Africa, the AMA 2023<br>fails to cater adequately for third-party funding (TPF), has no provision on customary law arbitration<br>(CLA) and creates too much procedural fragmentation. It is therefore recommended that the AMA 2023<br>be revised to mainstream customary law arbitration, reduce procedural fragmentation and provide<br>guidelines for the regulation of TPF in compliance with global developments thereby making the AMA<br>2023 attractive for selection as lex arbitri.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338787 Harnessing the Role of Arbitration in Renewable Energy and Climate Change Related Disputes in Nigeria: Potential Benefits and Challenges 2026-10-14T14:23:37+00:00 Oluwatosin Kate Olanrewaju-Elufowoju olarenwaju-elufowojuo@run.edu.ng Emmanuel Sonuga emmanuelsonugaesq@gmail.com Adedotun Onibokun dotun.onibokunj@gmail.com <p>The transition to renewable energy in Nigeria is critical for achieving climate goals<br>and sustainable development. However, this transition has led to an increasing<br>number of disputes related to carbon credit trading, environmental compliance,<br>and government incentives for renewable energy projects. Arbitration has emerged<br>as a preferred mechanism for resolving such climate-related conflicts due to its<br>flexibility, efficiency, and enforceability. This paper examines the role of arbitration<br>in addressing disputes in Nigeria’s renewable energy sector, particularly in the<br>context of climate change obligations and regulatory challenges. It explored the<br>legal frameworks governing climate-related arbitration, including the Arbitration<br>and Mediation Act 2023, international treaties, and specialized dispute resolution<br>mechanisms for environmental conflicts including the role of legal education. The<br>paper also analysed key challenges such as regulatory inconsistencies, enforcement<br>of arbitral awards, and the need for climate-focused arbitration expertise. The<br>paper proposed strategies for strengthening arbitration’s role in ensuring fair and<br>effective dispute resolution in Nigeria’s low carbon transition using the doctrinal<br>approach whilst drawing insights from relevant case studies. By enhancing<br>arbitration mechanisms and integrating climate-conscious legal frameworks,<br>Nigeria can foster investor confidence, uphold environmental commitments, and<br>accelerate the adoption of renewable energy. This study contributes to ongoing<br>discussions on leveraging arbitration for climate justice and sustainable energy<br>governance.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338790 Bodily Autonomy in Custody: Can Artificial Intelligence Advance Inmates’ Health Rights in Nigeria? 2026-10-14T14:31:42+00:00 Dorcas Adesola Thanni info@ogeesinstitute.org Rosetta Okiemute Isiavwe info@ogeesinstitute.org Mary Ann O. Ajayi info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>Bodily autonomy and informed consent are fundamental principles in medical law<br>and ethics, enshrined in both domestic and international human rights instruments.<br>However, in regimented environments such as correctional facilities, these rights<br>are frequently undermined by institutional constraints, power imbalances, and<br>inadequate legal oversight. In Nigeria, where the correctional health system is<br>fraught with systemic neglect, overcrowding, and poor medical governance, the<br>right of inmates to refuse treatment or make autonomous healthcare decisions<br>remains largely unexamined in both law and practice. This study investigates the<br>extent to which inmates in Nigerian correctional facilities can exercise their rights<br>to bodily autonomy and informed consent, particularly the right to accept or<br>refuse medical treatment. It further explores the potential of artificial intelligence<br>(AI) to support the ethical administration of healthcare in custodial settings by<br>improving documentation, enhancing transparency, and monitoring compliance<br>with consent protocols. While AI offers promising applications in safeguarding<br>inmates’ health rights, it also raises ethical concerns around surveillance, bias, and<br>the erosion of human-centred care. Through a doctrinal methodology this article<br>examines existing legal framework protecting inmate’s right to health and emerging<br>AI technologies. This study aims to uncover the gaps between legal guarantees and<br>custodial realities, and to propose actionable recommendations for rights-based<br>inmates’ health governance in Nigeria. The findings contribute to the broader<br>discourse on correctional reform, digital justice, and the ethical deployment of AI<br>in public health systems, particularly for marginalized and vulnerable populations.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338791 Unlocking Climate-Conscious Development in Sub-Saharan Africa – The Role of Article 6.2 and AfCFTA in a Just Energy Transition 2026-10-14T14:36:21+00:00 Walters Nsoh wnsoh@alfaisal.edu <p>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is simultaneously the least culpable for the climate<br>problem and one of the most vulnerable to its repercussions. Despite these risks,<br>SSA has enormous, untapped potential to contribute to global mitigation efforts<br>thanks to its substantial natural capital—including the Congo Basin, the Sahel, and<br>mangrove ecosystems—and significant renewable energy resources. The Paris<br>Agreement’s Article 6.2 mechanism provides an important opportunity for SSA<br>countries to convert their mitigation potential into sustainable development<br>financing, allowing SSA governments to monetize emission reductions from<br>activities such as avoided deforestation, afforestation, agroforestry, clean cooking,<br>and renewable energy deployment. In parallel, the African Continental Free Trade<br>Area (AfCFTA), which includes 54 nations and 1.4 billion people, provides a<br>supplementary framework for incorporating climate-conscious industry into<br>Africa's overall economic integration drive. AfCFTA may standardize carbon<br>requirements, open up cross-border renewable energy markets, and encourage<br>green value chains like sustainable cement, electric transportation, and regional<br>solar corridors. It also paves the door for a continental carbon market architecture<br>in which African goals, rather than global buyer interests, determine the terms of<br>involvement. This article contends that SSA may use the synergies between Article<br>6.2 procedures and the AfCFTA’s integration framework to accomplish a fair,<br>sovereign, and inclusive energy transition. By incorporating climate financing into<br>Africa’s development strategy, the continent has the potential to not only<br>strengthen resilience and cut emissions but also to pioneer a unique form of<br>climate-conscious growth that is both equitable and internationally significant.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338792 Economic, Social and Environmental Impacts of COVID-19 on Globalization and Spread of “Xeno-Racism” in Pandemic Environment 2026-10-14T14:40:01+00:00 Teoman Ertuğrul Tulun info@ogeesinstitute.org Ali Oğuz Diriöz info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>This article analyzes the impacts of pandemics on the economic and social<br>developments of countries from a historical perspective and exemplifies the<br>issue with the Corona Virus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this context, the<br>article explains the nature of COVID-19, the counter-measures taken by<br>countries to curb and eradicate the disease and tries to understand the socioeconomic consequences of these measures by focusing on their adverse effects<br>on the globalization phenomena. In this framework, the article dwells on the<br>importance of the “supply chains” notion. The article also reviews the<br>environmental repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic by referring to new<br>earth science concepts such as “ecocide” and their relationship with<br>globalization. Finally, the article explains the new discriminatory acts that have<br>surfaced in the COVID-19 pandemic period, elucidates the xenophobic and<br>racist behaviors faced in the previous pandemic periods, and introduces the<br>concept of “xeno-racism” for explaining the discriminatory behaviors surfaced<br>during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article makes the claim that "xenoracism" is currently one of the biggest challenges facing humanity</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338793 Administrative Accountability in Vietnam’s Digital Government: Adapting the EU Principle of Good Administration 2026-10-14T14:44:45+00:00 Nguyen Thi Thuy nguyenthuy@hlu.edu.vn Tran Kim Lieu lieutk@hlu.edu.vn Vu Van Tuan tuanvv@hlu.edu.vn <p>Digital governance has become a central strategy for enhancing public sector<br>efficiency, transparency, and accountability worldwide. In Vietnam, the rapid<br>adoption of e-government systems presents both opportunities and challenges in<br>aligning administrative practices with citizen expectations and global standards.<br>This study investigates the integration of European Union (EU) principles of good<br>administration – transparency, impartiality, legal certainty, and the right to redress<br>– into Vietnam’s digital governance framework, with the aim of strengthening<br>administrative accountability, citizen participation, and public trust. A qualitative<br>case study research design was employed, drawing on provincial governance<br>performance reports, policy documents, and interviews with administrative<br>officials. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke’s framework to<br>identify patterns in institutional practices, technological implementation, and<br>citizen engagement. Results indicate that provinces with well-developed digital<br>platforms exhibit higher transparency, greater procedural impartiality, and<br>enhanced citizen satisfaction. Legal certainty and accessible redress mechanisms<br>were found to be unevenly implemented, with institutional capacity, technological<br>infrastructure, and inter-agency coordination acting as critical mediating factors.<br>Furthermore, citizen participation emerged as a significant determinant of trust,<br>providing oversight and feedback that reinforce administrative compliance and<br>performance. The study concludes that the systematic adaptation of EU<br>governance principles can improve procedural consistency, equitable service<br>delivery, and public confidence in Vietnam’s digital government. Strategic<br>investment in institutional capacity, technological infrastructure, participatory<br>mechanisms, and monitoring systems is necessary to sustain these reforms. The<br>findings provide actionable insights for policymakers seeking to align national<br>digital governance practices with international standards while addressing local<br>socio-technical and institutional challenges</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338794 Advancing Eyecare in Nigeria: Driving Innovation and Partnerships for Sustainable Development 2026-10-14T14:50:22+00:00 Elisabeta Smaranda Olarinde info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>Being the text of the distinguished keynote lecture delivered on March 26, 2026 at<br>the Eyeball Summit 2026 – Eye Health Leadership &amp; Investment Summit/Expo<br>(2nd Edition) organized by the Optometrist and Dispensing Opticians<br>Registration Board of Nigeria held at in Abuja, Nigeria</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338795 Illicit Financial Flows and National Development – Drivers, Challenges, and Pathways for Multi-Stakeholder Solutions 2026-10-14T14:52:45+00:00 Bolaji Owasanoye info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>Being the text of the distinguished keynote lecture delivered on April 13, 2026 at<br>the 9th Annual Conference of the International Law Association (Nigerian Branch)<br>held at the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS)<br>Abuja, Nigeria.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338796 Executive Authority, Petroleum Governance, and Fiscal Federalism: A Critical Appraisal of Nigeria’s 2026 Oil Revenue Remittance Order. 2026-10-14T14:55:38+00:00 Sobur Ayomide Ganiyu ayomidesobur758@gmail.com <p>This paper examines the 2026 Executive Order issued by President Bola Ahmed<br>Tinubu directing the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited to remit<br>oil and gas revenues directly into the Federation Account. The Order represents<br>a significant shift in Nigeria’s petroleum revenue governance framework<br>established under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), which commercialised<br>NNPCL and permitted certain statutory deductions before remittance. This<br>study adopts a doctrinal legal research methodology to assess the constitutional<br>validity, fiscal implications, and governance consequences of the directive. It<br>interrogates the interaction between Sections 5, 44(3), and 162 of the 1999<br>Constitution (as amended), the doctrine of separation of powers, and the<br>principles of fiscal federalism. While the Executive Order is defended as a<br>corrective mechanism aimed at enhancing transparency, preventing revenue<br>leakages, and strengthening Federation Account allocations, it also raises<br>concerns regarding executive overreach and potential inconsistency with<br>statutory provisions of the PIA. The paper argues that although the objective of<br>promoting accountability is legitimate, sustainable reform requires legislative<br>alignment to avoid constitutional conflict and regulatory uncertainty.<br>Ultimately, the Order underscores the enduring tension between corporate<br>autonomy in state-owned enterprises and constitutional supremacy in public<br>revenue management as stated in section 162(2) of CFRN.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338766 Editorial Comments 2026-10-14T13:24:28+00:00 Eghosa O Ekhator info@ogeesinstitute.org <p>No Abstract.</p> 2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria