https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/issue/feedJournal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The)2026-10-14T15:15:27+00:00Dr. Damilola S. Olawuyi (Executive Director)dolawuyi@ogeesinstitute.edu.ngOpen Journal Systems<p><em>The Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy</em> (JSDLP) is Nigeria’s first interdisciplinary sustainable development journal, published by the OGEES Institute, Afe Babalola University, Nigeria. The journal fosters the dissemination of research results and scholarly papers by teaching and research scholars in Africa and across the world in the area of sustainable development law and policy. The OGEES Institute publishes two issues per year.</p> <p>The thematic focus of the journal span across broad areas of sustainable development law and policy ranging from the economic, social and environmental dimensions. As such papers that explore broad themes of sustainable development such as environment, natural resources, green economy, international trade, banking, taxation, public policy, public private partnerships, alternative dispute resolutions, peace, and conflict studies are normally given top consideration. The Editorial Board of the Journal comprises international development scholars and experts from Italy, United Kingdom, Indonesia, Nigeria, Canada and the United States that provide leadership and lend their expertise to promote and enhance the scholarly relevance of the journal. </p> <p>Other websites associated with this journal: <a title="http://www.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/research-publications" href="http://www.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/research-publications" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.ogeesinstitute.edu.ng/index.php/research-publications</a> and <a title="http://www.abuad.edu.ng" href="http://www.abuad.edu.ng" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.abuad.edu.ng</a></p>https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338768From Form to Function: Enforcement-Centred Reforms for Sustainable Corporate Governance2026-10-14T13:26:43+00:00Anil Karkiinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>The substantial “enforcement gap” in the developing country’s capital markets<br>makes them less trustworthy. This is because corporate governance rules that are<br>formally adopted do not actually function. This research article contends that the<br>primary issue is not about a lack of laws but it an insufficiency of enforcement<br>capability. It is, therefore, presented in this article that an integrated, four-pillar<br>enforcement architecture is the basis for sustainable corporate governance reforms<br>by going beyond the usual focus on legislative form. This article employs a doctrinal<br>and comparative policy analysis to look at how the four-pillars that follow function<br>together: regulatory design (Pillar 1), which strategically combines voluntary codes<br>along with mandatory rules; supervisory regulation (Pillar 2), which requires<br>independent and powerful securities regulators; adjudicatory capacity (Pillar 3),<br>which includes specialised courts and strong arbitration; and market discipline<br>(Pillar 4), which is driven by institutional investors as well as a free media. The<br>analysis shows that these components cannot function on their own as they<br>function together as a unified functionary. If one of them fails, the whole<br>enforcement framework could fall apart. The article finds that sustainable corporate<br>governance is an exercise in institutional transformation as it requires a contextspecific, sequenced strategy that strengthens the connections within this<br>framework. It concludes that it is only by the means of such a comprehensive<br>process for the sustainable corporate governance that the developing countries can<br>move from reform in form towards reform in function, and consequently<br>effectively protecting minority shareholders, generating long-term investment, and<br>achieving market confidence.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338769Reinforcing Party Autonomy in India: Need For Legal Framework on Model Online Arbitration Rules (MOAR)2026-10-14T13:30:34+00:00Shraddha Shuklashraddha.shraddha@res.christuniversity.inIpsita Rayray.ipsita@christuniversity.in<p>Parties and their counsels to disputes in international trade and commerce<br>have been keenly observing the legal environment in India regarding the<br>progress of its arbitration regime. In recent times, offering technological<br>support to the settlement procedure has enhanced the parties’ ability to more<br>effectively manage their arbitration proceedings. The study thematically<br>reviews the rise of party autonomy principle in India and traces its<br>development from traditional form of arbitration to its modern context in<br>online arbitration. Further, by employing a doctrinal methodology, the paper<br>examines the legal validity of an online or technology-based arbitration<br>conducted in India. The findings of the study conclude that albeit, an entirely<br>online-based arbitration would be legally valid in India, there is an absence of<br>a consolidated legal framework to regulate such proceedings in the country.<br>Predictability and certainty in online proceedings would potentially enhance<br>the principle of party autonomy in India, thereby increasing its arbitration<br>friendliness. The study provides a justification on the need for model online<br>arbitration rules (hereinafter MOAR) in India while also referring to similar<br>rules drafted in jurisdictions like Sweden, China, and South Korea. The paper<br>also discusses potential issues that might arise while drafting online arbitration<br>rules for India, thus, providing a momentum towards initiating legal<br>discussions on the drafting of such rules.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338770Brazilian National Determined Contributions: Current Challenges and Way Forward2026-10-14T13:35:20+00:00Eduardo G. Pereirainfo@ogeesinstitute.edu.ngJuliana Carvalhoinfo@ogeesinstitute.edu.ngDominique Mouetteinfo@ogeesinstitute.orgDanielle M.T. Dennyinfo@ogeesinstitute.orgAlexandre de Barros Galloinfo@ogeesinstitute.orgMaria Eduarda de Oliveira Rochainfo@ogeesinstitute.orgAlberto Fossainfo@ogeesinstitute.orgEdmilson Moutinho dos Santosinfo@ogeesinstitute.orgCarlos Eduardo P. Cerriinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>No Abstract.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338773Adaptive Governance: Panacea for Discordance in the Kenyan Regulatory Framework on Zoonoses2026-10-14T13:42:10+00:00Susan Yarasusanyara@uonbi.ac.keCollins Odotec.odote@uonbi.ac.keRobert Kibugirmkibugi@uonbi.ac.ke<p>The emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic diseases globally has posed great<br>financial and health burdens over the years. Anthropogenic disturbances to the<br>environment have caused widespread ecosystem disruptions, increasing<br>interactions between humans and wildlife and exacerbating transmission of<br>zoonotic diseases. Recently, the COVID-19 outbreak renewed discussions on<br>interlinkages between human, animal, and environmental health. These<br>interlinkages evidence a complex relationship encompassing various disciplines<br>and actors, going beyond the traditional use of epidemiology to explain new<br>infections. However, the current Kenyan regulatory framework fails to recognize<br>the multidisciplinary nature of zoonoses, offering a siloed, discordant, and<br>fragmented framework. Ideally, dealing with zoonoses would need collaboration,<br>cooperation, and action from various actors in the social and ecological fields.<br>Based on literature review and doctrinal research, this paper argues for the<br>adoption of an adaptive governance framework underpinned within the Social<br>Ecological Systems (SES) theory as the appropriate regulatory design. Such a<br>framework as already implemented in countries such as Chile, lays the foundation<br>for mainstreaming environmental health into human and animal health governance<br>frameworks as well as fostering multidisciplinary approaches and collaborations<br>of stakeholders within the different disciplines.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338775Towards an Efficient Regulatory Framework for Single-Use-Plastics in Nigeria2026-10-14T13:46:53+00:00Sylvanus Gbendazhi Barnabasbarnabas.sylvanus@nileuniversity.edu.ng<p>Single-use plastics (SUPs) constitutes a critical environmental and regulatory<br>challenge in Nigeria. Although there are few relevant legislations, and policies such<br>as the National Policy on Plastic Waste Management 2020 and the National Policy<br>on Solid Waste Management 2020, there is poor implementation and enforcement.<br>Through a mainly doctrinal analysis, this article examines the challenges of SUPs<br>waste in Nigeria, evaluate the existing regulatory frameworks, highlights<br>international best practices, and proposes strategic reforms rooted in sustainability,<br>and compliance with global environmental standards. As a result of their progress<br>in the effective regulation of SUPs, the paper draws lessons from Sweden, the<br>Netherlands, EU, Rwanda and India. It highlights the importance of banning<br>harmful SUPs, enforcing corporate recycling targets and integrating informal<br>waste collectors into formal sectors. It also proposes key pathways such as<br>establishing plastic recovery hubs, implementing waste-to-energy projects and<br>incentivising eco-friendly products innovations. The role of government, industry<br>and civil society in achieving a sustainable circular economy for SUPs is<br>demonstrated. The findings suggest that a multi-stakeholder approach, supported<br>by strict regulations, financial incentives and behavioural change campaigns, can<br>transform SUPs into economic assets. If effectively implemented, a circular<br>economy model will reduce SUPs pollution, create green jobs and enhance<br>Nigeria’s environmental sustainability</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338777Integrating the Paris Agreement and the SDGs In Domestic Law: A Legal Pathway for Coherent Climate–SDG Implementation in Nigeria2026-10-14T13:50:09+00:00Noah Afedolor Izuokumorinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>This article scrutinizes the fragmented implementation of Nigeria’s Nationally<br>Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable<br>Development Goals (SDGs). It argues that the absence of a coherent legal and<br>institutional framework remains the primary barrier to achieving both agendas<br>simultaneously. Existing scholarship identifies conceptual synergies between<br>climate change and the SDGs but offers limited guidance on how developing<br>countries can operationalize these linkages through domestic law, particularly in<br>Nigeria. The paper identifies key gaps. These include: (1) current policies recognize<br>synergies within the scope of climate change policy but do not extend to the SDGs;<br>(2) weak coordination among institutions continues to undermine<br>implementation. To address these gaps, the article makes two contributions. First,<br>it identifies three high-leverage alignment nodes: energy (SDG 7), land and forestry<br>(SDG 15), and food security (SDG 2). It explains how actions within these nodes<br>can advance NDC and SDG outcomes concurrently. Second, drawing on doctrinal<br>analysis and comparative insights from jurisdictions including Mexico, Costa Rica,<br>Japan, and South Korea, the article demonstrates how Nigeria can move from<br>fragmented implementation to a coherent national strategy that delivers joint gains<br>for both frameworks. The article proposes an integrated approach for aligning<br>NDC and SDG obligations, including policy integration, inter-agency<br>coordination with reporting duties to Parliament, multi-stakeholder engagement,<br>and the ring-fencing and redeployment of subsidy savings for projects that deliver<br>on both agendas.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338779Addressing Regulatory Deficiencies: Enhancing Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria’s Extractive Industry through Local Informal Institutions2026-10-14T13:55:08+00:00Uchechukwu Nwokeu.nwoke@essex.ac.ukGodswill Agbaitorog.agbaitoro@essex.ac.ukComfort Tioluwaniinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>The paper emphasises the importance of incorporating local informal institutions<br>into Nigeria's corporate social responsibility (CSR) frameworks, particularly in<br>regions like the Niger Delta. It underscores that recognising these communitybased organisations is vital for enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of CSR<br>initiatives. By fostering collaborative partnerships and establishing mechanisms for<br>engagement, companies can better align their CSR activities with the needs and<br>realities of local communities. The study advocates legislative reforms to make<br>CSR a mandatory requirement in Nigerian company law, obliging corporate<br>directors to recognise and collaborate with informal institutions. Additionally, it<br>proposes expanding the scope of corporate fiduciary duty to encompass<br>responsibilities towards local communities and environmental management. This<br>change would enable companies to act as drivers of positive change, benefiting<br>both their business interests and the well-being of local populations. Furthermore,<br>the paper highlights the potential of Impact and Benefit Agreements (IBAs) to<br>establish frameworks for social inclusion and to encourage the active participation<br>of local stakeholders in corporate decision-making.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338782Examining Climate Change Litigation Approaches in Nigeria2026-10-14T14:00:33+00:00Taofeeq N. Alatisealatise.tn@unilorin.edu.ng<p>Climate change litigation is an important legal tool of climate change governance.<br>Across several jurisdictions, the increasing use of litigation to address critical<br>elements of climate change is redefining the obligation of states and corporate<br>entities. However, the successes of these cases have been largely influenced by the<br>legal approaches adopted by litigants in their filings and arguments in courts. The<br>application of these approaches by litigants and courts have provided basis for the<br>increasing use of litigation as a tool for seeking redress against the adverse impacts<br>of climate change. In the same manner, litigants in Nigeria are applying these legal<br>approaches to institute climate-related suits in courts. In this paper, we examine<br>these approaches and the extent to which they have been invoked by litigants and<br>courts. To achieve this, the paper adopts a doctrinal research approach for content<br>analysis of primary and secondary sources. The paper argues that constitutional<br>and human rights legal approaches have stronger potentials to promote access to<br>justice in climate litigation in Nigeria for two reasons: first, they impose legal<br>obligations on government and corporate entities. Second, they provide legal basis<br>for potential victims to seek redress in courts.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338783Reconsidering the Right to Health and Wellbeing and the Challenge of Healthcare Delivery in Nigeria: Nigeria’s Trajectory Towards SDG3 by 20302026-10-14T14:04:14+00:00Brown Etareri Umukorobeumukoro@delsu.edu.ngEjiro T. Kore-Okitiejiro.okiti@delsu.edu.ng<p>Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG3) aims to ensure healthy lives and promote<br>well-being for all ages by 2030. It focuses on the right to health which is a<br>fundamental human right at international law. This goal is premised on the fact<br>that good health is an essential pre-requisite for the persistent and adequate<br>functioning of every individual and every human society. The study uses doctrinal<br>methodology in engaging in a systematic analysis of primary legal sources like<br>relevant provisions of the Constitution, health statutes and judicial decisions. The<br>article provides a survey into Nigeria’s trajectory towards SDG3 amid persistent<br>challenges including the legal status of the right to health in Nigeria and inadequate<br>healthcare infrastructure, drawing from statutory frameworks like the<br>Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Health Act 2014 and<br>the National Health Insurance Authority Act 2022 as well as Nigeria’s behaviour<br>towards its healthcare obligations. It analyses gaps in policy implementation and<br>the challenge of funding for the purpose of drawing a conclusion whether Nigeria<br>is truly committed to the 2030 Sustainable Development Plan or just paying lip<br>service to the international community on the SDGs obligation on states.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338785No Development in Darkness: The Role of the Nigerian Electricity Act 2023 in Advancing Selected Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria2026-10-14T14:08:34+00:00Oluchukwu Precious Obiomaoluchukwu.obioma@unn.edu.ngAmarachi Remigius Dikeamarachi.dike@unn.edu.ngNewman U. Richardsnewman.richards@unn.edu.ng<p>Nigeria's persistent electricity challenges have significantly hindered its progress in<br>sustainable development, affecting vital sectors such as education, healthcare, and<br>industry. This paper examines the role of the Nigerian Electricity Act 2023 in<br>advancing selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 1 (No<br>Poverty), SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being), SDG 4 (Quality Education), and<br>SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy). Using a doctrinal research approach, it<br>assesses the provisions of the Act, relevant constitutional principles, and<br>comparative legal instruments to evaluate their effectiveness in addressing Nigeria’s<br>long-standing electricity shortages. However, the findings indicate that although<br>the Act introduces progressive reforms—such as decentralisation of the electricity<br>sector, promotion of renewable energy, and the establishment of consumer<br>protection measures. However, implementation gaps, institutional weaknesses, and<br>infrastructural deficiencies continue to hinder the realisation of the targeted SDGs.<br>The paper contends that reliable electricity access is essential for poverty alleviation,<br>health service delivery, and educational outcomes, and therefore plays a central role<br>in Nigeria’s sustainable development. It recommends short-term measures<br>(strengthening regulatory agencies and enforcement), medium-term measures<br>(expanding the grid and investing in renewable energy), and long-term strategies<br>(full market liberalisation and universal access initiatives). The study concludes that<br>while the Electricity Act 2023 marks a step forward in aligning Nigeria with the<br>2030 Agenda, sustained political commitment, adequate financing, and<br>strengthened institutional capacity are vital to ensure that no Nigerian remains in<br>darkness.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338786Nigeria’s Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023: Reform, Continuity, and the Quest For SDG 162026-10-14T14:18:10+00:00David Tarh-Akong Eyongndieyongndi18@gmail.comGarvin Ufuoma Oyibodorogarvinesquire@gmail.comAnselm Uchechukwu Abonyi barristeruchechukwu2002@gmail.comAgbaovwe Emmanuel Oturuhoyi info@ogeesinstitute.orgOlasupo Badaolasupobada@gmail.com<p>Given the rise in disputes arising from domestic and trans-border commercial and contractual<br>agreements and the inherent challenges associated with litigation in resolving them, in 1988, Nigeria<br>enacted the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (ACA 1988) styled after the United Nations Committee<br>on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL Model Law). After several years, many developments in the<br>field of Alternative Disputes Resolution (ADR) have rendered the ACA, 1988 incapable of matchingup; therefore, resulting in clamour for its overhaul., The National Assembly in response, enacted the<br>Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023 (AMA 2023). This paper adopts doctrinal method in interrogating<br>whether the AMA 2023 in comparison to the erstwhile ACA 1988, is a revolutionary legislation or a<br>mere revision regarding the law and practice of arbitration. The article, on comparative basis, gauged the<br>innovations introduced by the AMA 2023 against the laws in jurisdictions like Ghana, South Africa,<br>Kenya, Hong Kong and Singapore aimed at gleaning reciprocal lessons for Nigeria The scope of this<br>inquiry is limited to the arbitration provisions of the AMA 2023.The article observed that, ADR is an<br>enabler of the Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG16) centred on peace, justice, strong institution<br>which the erstwhile ACA 1988 could not optimally achieve hence, it inquires whether the AMA 2023<br>promotes SDG 16. The article found that a survey of the AMA 2023 in comparison with the ACA 1988,<br>it contains novel provisions such as provision of immunity for arbitrator, consolidation and joinder of<br>parties, emergency arbitrator, enlarged limitation period, gender neutral language, etc., making it a<br>progressive or revolutionary legislative reform. Also, the article argues that AMA 2023 is a catalyst for<br>the actualisation of SDG 16 in Nigeria through purposive adoption and application. The article also<br>found that, in comparison to Ghana, Kenya, Hong Kong, Singapore and South Africa, the AMA 2023<br>fails to cater adequately for third-party funding (TPF), has no provision on customary law arbitration<br>(CLA) and creates too much procedural fragmentation. It is therefore recommended that the AMA 2023<br>be revised to mainstream customary law arbitration, reduce procedural fragmentation and provide<br>guidelines for the regulation of TPF in compliance with global developments thereby making the AMA<br>2023 attractive for selection as lex arbitri.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338787Harnessing the Role of Arbitration in Renewable Energy and Climate Change Related Disputes in Nigeria: Potential Benefits and Challenges2026-10-14T14:23:37+00:00Oluwatosin Kate Olanrewaju-Elufowojuolarenwaju-elufowojuo@run.edu.ngEmmanuel Sonugaemmanuelsonugaesq@gmail.comAdedotun Onibokundotun.onibokunj@gmail.com<p>The transition to renewable energy in Nigeria is critical for achieving climate goals<br>and sustainable development. However, this transition has led to an increasing<br>number of disputes related to carbon credit trading, environmental compliance,<br>and government incentives for renewable energy projects. Arbitration has emerged<br>as a preferred mechanism for resolving such climate-related conflicts due to its<br>flexibility, efficiency, and enforceability. This paper examines the role of arbitration<br>in addressing disputes in Nigeria’s renewable energy sector, particularly in the<br>context of climate change obligations and regulatory challenges. It explored the<br>legal frameworks governing climate-related arbitration, including the Arbitration<br>and Mediation Act 2023, international treaties, and specialized dispute resolution<br>mechanisms for environmental conflicts including the role of legal education. The<br>paper also analysed key challenges such as regulatory inconsistencies, enforcement<br>of arbitral awards, and the need for climate-focused arbitration expertise. The<br>paper proposed strategies for strengthening arbitration’s role in ensuring fair and<br>effective dispute resolution in Nigeria’s low carbon transition using the doctrinal<br>approach whilst drawing insights from relevant case studies. By enhancing<br>arbitration mechanisms and integrating climate-conscious legal frameworks,<br>Nigeria can foster investor confidence, uphold environmental commitments, and<br>accelerate the adoption of renewable energy. This study contributes to ongoing<br>discussions on leveraging arbitration for climate justice and sustainable energy<br>governance.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338790Bodily Autonomy in Custody: Can Artificial Intelligence Advance Inmates’ Health Rights in Nigeria?2026-10-14T14:31:42+00:00Dorcas Adesola Thanniinfo@ogeesinstitute.orgRosetta Okiemute Isiavweinfo@ogeesinstitute.orgMary Ann O. Ajayiinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>Bodily autonomy and informed consent are fundamental principles in medical law<br>and ethics, enshrined in both domestic and international human rights instruments.<br>However, in regimented environments such as correctional facilities, these rights<br>are frequently undermined by institutional constraints, power imbalances, and<br>inadequate legal oversight. In Nigeria, where the correctional health system is<br>fraught with systemic neglect, overcrowding, and poor medical governance, the<br>right of inmates to refuse treatment or make autonomous healthcare decisions<br>remains largely unexamined in both law and practice. This study investigates the<br>extent to which inmates in Nigerian correctional facilities can exercise their rights<br>to bodily autonomy and informed consent, particularly the right to accept or<br>refuse medical treatment. It further explores the potential of artificial intelligence<br>(AI) to support the ethical administration of healthcare in custodial settings by<br>improving documentation, enhancing transparency, and monitoring compliance<br>with consent protocols. While AI offers promising applications in safeguarding<br>inmates’ health rights, it also raises ethical concerns around surveillance, bias, and<br>the erosion of human-centred care. Through a doctrinal methodology this article<br>examines existing legal framework protecting inmate’s right to health and emerging<br>AI technologies. This study aims to uncover the gaps between legal guarantees and<br>custodial realities, and to propose actionable recommendations for rights-based<br>inmates’ health governance in Nigeria. The findings contribute to the broader<br>discourse on correctional reform, digital justice, and the ethical deployment of AI<br>in public health systems, particularly for marginalized and vulnerable populations.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338791Unlocking Climate-Conscious Development in Sub-Saharan Africa – The Role of Article 6.2 and AfCFTA in a Just Energy Transition2026-10-14T14:36:21+00:00Walters Nsohwnsoh@alfaisal.edu<p>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is simultaneously the least culpable for the climate<br>problem and one of the most vulnerable to its repercussions. Despite these risks,<br>SSA has enormous, untapped potential to contribute to global mitigation efforts<br>thanks to its substantial natural capital—including the Congo Basin, the Sahel, and<br>mangrove ecosystems—and significant renewable energy resources. The Paris<br>Agreement’s Article 6.2 mechanism provides an important opportunity for SSA<br>countries to convert their mitigation potential into sustainable development<br>financing, allowing SSA governments to monetize emission reductions from<br>activities such as avoided deforestation, afforestation, agroforestry, clean cooking,<br>and renewable energy deployment. In parallel, the African Continental Free Trade<br>Area (AfCFTA), which includes 54 nations and 1.4 billion people, provides a<br>supplementary framework for incorporating climate-conscious industry into<br>Africa's overall economic integration drive. AfCFTA may standardize carbon<br>requirements, open up cross-border renewable energy markets, and encourage<br>green value chains like sustainable cement, electric transportation, and regional<br>solar corridors. It also paves the door for a continental carbon market architecture<br>in which African goals, rather than global buyer interests, determine the terms of<br>involvement. This article contends that SSA may use the synergies between Article<br>6.2 procedures and the AfCFTA’s integration framework to accomplish a fair,<br>sovereign, and inclusive energy transition. By incorporating climate financing into<br>Africa’s development strategy, the continent has the potential to not only<br>strengthen resilience and cut emissions but also to pioneer a unique form of<br>climate-conscious growth that is both equitable and internationally significant.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338792Economic, Social and Environmental Impacts of COVID-19 on Globalization and Spread of “Xeno-Racism” in Pandemic Environment2026-10-14T14:40:01+00:00Teoman Ertuğrul Tuluninfo@ogeesinstitute.orgAli Oğuz Diriözinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>This article analyzes the impacts of pandemics on the economic and social<br>developments of countries from a historical perspective and exemplifies the<br>issue with the Corona Virus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this context, the<br>article explains the nature of COVID-19, the counter-measures taken by<br>countries to curb and eradicate the disease and tries to understand the socioeconomic consequences of these measures by focusing on their adverse effects<br>on the globalization phenomena. In this framework, the article dwells on the<br>importance of the “supply chains” notion. The article also reviews the<br>environmental repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic by referring to new<br>earth science concepts such as “ecocide” and their relationship with<br>globalization. Finally, the article explains the new discriminatory acts that have<br>surfaced in the COVID-19 pandemic period, elucidates the xenophobic and<br>racist behaviors faced in the previous pandemic periods, and introduces the<br>concept of “xeno-racism” for explaining the discriminatory behaviors surfaced<br>during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article makes the claim that "xenoracism" is currently one of the biggest challenges facing humanity</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338793Administrative Accountability in Vietnam’s Digital Government: Adapting the EU Principle of Good Administration2026-10-14T14:44:45+00:00Nguyen Thi Thuynguyenthuy@hlu.edu.vnTran Kim Lieulieutk@hlu.edu.vnVu Van Tuantuanvv@hlu.edu.vn<p>Digital governance has become a central strategy for enhancing public sector<br>efficiency, transparency, and accountability worldwide. In Vietnam, the rapid<br>adoption of e-government systems presents both opportunities and challenges in<br>aligning administrative practices with citizen expectations and global standards.<br>This study investigates the integration of European Union (EU) principles of good<br>administration – transparency, impartiality, legal certainty, and the right to redress<br>– into Vietnam’s digital governance framework, with the aim of strengthening<br>administrative accountability, citizen participation, and public trust. A qualitative<br>case study research design was employed, drawing on provincial governance<br>performance reports, policy documents, and interviews with administrative<br>officials. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke’s framework to<br>identify patterns in institutional practices, technological implementation, and<br>citizen engagement. Results indicate that provinces with well-developed digital<br>platforms exhibit higher transparency, greater procedural impartiality, and<br>enhanced citizen satisfaction. Legal certainty and accessible redress mechanisms<br>were found to be unevenly implemented, with institutional capacity, technological<br>infrastructure, and inter-agency coordination acting as critical mediating factors.<br>Furthermore, citizen participation emerged as a significant determinant of trust,<br>providing oversight and feedback that reinforce administrative compliance and<br>performance. The study concludes that the systematic adaptation of EU<br>governance principles can improve procedural consistency, equitable service<br>delivery, and public confidence in Vietnam’s digital government. Strategic<br>investment in institutional capacity, technological infrastructure, participatory<br>mechanisms, and monitoring systems is necessary to sustain these reforms. The<br>findings provide actionable insights for policymakers seeking to align national<br>digital governance practices with international standards while addressing local<br>socio-technical and institutional challenges</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338794Advancing Eyecare in Nigeria: Driving Innovation and Partnerships for Sustainable Development2026-10-14T14:50:22+00:00Elisabeta Smaranda Olarindeinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>Being the text of the distinguished keynote lecture delivered on March 26, 2026 at<br>the Eyeball Summit 2026 – Eye Health Leadership & Investment Summit/Expo<br>(2nd Edition) organized by the Optometrist and Dispensing Opticians<br>Registration Board of Nigeria held at in Abuja, Nigeria</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338795Illicit Financial Flows and National Development – Drivers, Challenges, and Pathways for Multi-Stakeholder Solutions2026-10-14T14:52:45+00:00Bolaji Owasanoyeinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>Being the text of the distinguished keynote lecture delivered on April 13, 2026 at<br>the 9th Annual Conference of the International Law Association (Nigerian Branch)<br>held at the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS)<br>Abuja, Nigeria.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338796Executive Authority, Petroleum Governance, and Fiscal Federalism: A Critical Appraisal of Nigeria’s 2026 Oil Revenue Remittance Order.2026-10-14T14:55:38+00:00Sobur Ayomide Ganiyu ayomidesobur758@gmail.com<p>This paper examines the 2026 Executive Order issued by President Bola Ahmed<br>Tinubu directing the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited to remit<br>oil and gas revenues directly into the Federation Account. The Order represents<br>a significant shift in Nigeria’s petroleum revenue governance framework<br>established under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), which commercialised<br>NNPCL and permitted certain statutory deductions before remittance. This<br>study adopts a doctrinal legal research methodology to assess the constitutional<br>validity, fiscal implications, and governance consequences of the directive. It<br>interrogates the interaction between Sections 5, 44(3), and 162 of the 1999<br>Constitution (as amended), the doctrine of separation of powers, and the<br>principles of fiscal federalism. While the Executive Order is defended as a<br>corrective mechanism aimed at enhancing transparency, preventing revenue<br>leakages, and strengthening Federation Account allocations, it also raises<br>concerns regarding executive overreach and potential inconsistency with<br>statutory provisions of the PIA. The paper argues that although the objective of<br>promoting accountability is legitimate, sustainable reform requires legislative<br>alignment to avoid constitutional conflict and regulatory uncertainty.<br>Ultimately, the Order underscores the enduring tension between corporate<br>autonomy in state-owned enterprises and constitutional supremacy in public<br>revenue management as stated in section 162(2) of CFRN.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeriahttps://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/338766Editorial Comments2026-10-14T13:24:28+00:00Eghosa O Ekhatorinfo@ogeesinstitute.org<p>No Abstract.</p>2026-10-14T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Institute for Oil, Gas, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (OGEES), Afe Babalola University, Nigeria