PROMOTING ACCESS TO AFRICAN RESEARCH

Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

Log in or Register to get access to full text downloads.

Remember me or Register



Effect of whitening toothpastes on bonding of restorative materials to enamel of primary teeth

FY Abdelmegid

Abstract


Objective: The aim of this in vitro investigation was to measure shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin composite and a resin‑modified glass ionomer to enamel of primary teeth after application of different whitening toothpastes (WTs).
Materials and Methods: Eighty labial enamel surfaces of primary incisors were randomly distributed into 8 groups of 10 each according to the surface treatment and bonding material. G1 and G2, control (brushed with water without WT); G3 and G4, (brushed with Colgate Optic White WT [Colgate‑Palmolive Company, New York, NY, USA]), G5 and G6, (brushed with Crest Pro‑Health Whitening WT [Procter and Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA]) and G7 and G8, (brushed with Arm and Hammer Advance White Extreme Whitening with Stain Defense WT [Church and Dwight Co., Princeton, NJ, USA]). SBS was measured at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min and the type of bond failure was assessed using a stereomicroscope.
Results: There was significant difference between SBS of composite resin in groups 1, 3, 5, and 7 (P < 0.001), but no difference between resin‑modified glass ionomer in groups 2, 4, 6, and 8 (P < 0.056). SBS of group 1 (control) was greater than groups 3, 5, and 7. There was a significant difference between group 1 and group 2 as well as group 7 and group 8 (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: WTs affect SBS of resin composite, but not resin‑modified glass ionomer to enamel of primary teeth. No difference of failure modes between different groups of tested materials.

Key words: Dental enamel, restorative materials, shear bond strength, whitening toothpaste




http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.164333
AJOL African Journals Online