Main Article Content

Application of the Canadian C-Spine rule and nexus low criteria and results of cervical spine radiography in emergency condition


William Ngatchou
Jeanne Beirnaert
Daniel Lemogoum
Cyril Bouland
Pierre Youatou
Ahmed Sabry Ramadan
Regis Sontou
Maimouna Bol Alima
Alain Plumaker
Virginie Guimfacq
Claude Bika
Pierre Mols

Abstract

Introduction: the Canadian C Spine Rule (CCR) and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (Nexus) low criteria are well accepted as guide to help physician in case of cervical blunt trauma.


Methods: we aimed to evaluate retrospectively the application of these recommendations in our emergency department. Secondly we analyzed the quality of cervical spine radiography (CSR) in an emergency setting.


Results: 281 patients with cervical blunt trauma were analyzed retrospectively. The CCR and the NEXUS rules were respected in 91.2% and 96.8% of cases respectively. No lesions were found in 96.4% of patient. A lesion was present in 1.1% of patient and suspected in 2.5% of patient. The quality of CSR was adequate in only 37.7% of patient. The poor quality of CSR was due either to the lack of C7 vertebrae visualization in 64.6% or other lower vertebrae in 28%. Other causes included the absence of open mouth view (8%), the absence C1 vertebrae visualization (3.4%), artifact in 2.3% and the absence of lateral view in 0.6% of patient.


Conclusion: CCR and NEXUS are widely used in our emergency department. The high rate of inadequate CSR reinforces the debate about it’s utility in emergency condition.


Journal Identifiers


eISSN: 1937-8688