Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 29, 2025Keywords:
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright in all material published in PER/PELJ vests in the author, provided that authors grant, by submission of their contributions, permission that their contributions may be shared and adapted without restriction. An author furthermore agrees that the same contribution may not be published elsewhere without the written permission of the editor.
Anyone gaining access, electronically or otherwise, to a contribution to PER, may quote from such contribution, use the intellectual content thereof, share and adapt it, but subject to the following conditions:
you must give appropriate credit, provide a link and indicate if changes were made; and
the copyright of the author(s) may not be infringed in any way.
Main Article Content
The impact of temporary employment services on employees' fundamental rights and fair labour practices: Assessing the effectiveness of Section 198A of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995
Phakisho Mello
Abstract
This article examines the regulatory landscape governing temporary employment services (TES) in South Africa, with a focus on job security and the protection of fundamental labour rights. Over the years, the regulation of TES has been problematic, especially with regard to exercising fundamental rights and the right to fair labour practices. Despite legal regulation, TES continue to raise concerns about employees' exploitation and job security. Using a doctrinal and qualitative research methodology, this article explores the vulnerability of TES employees and the complexities inherent in triangular employment relationships. It interrogates constitutional issues, employer accountability and fairness in labour practices in light of landmark decisions like Nape and Assign Services.
While there is a recognised need for labour broking relationships, the research underscores persistent concerns surrounding their impact on workers, particularly those earning below the earnings threshold. The article highlights the difficulties of preserving the fundamental rights of and fair labour practices for TES employees. The complexity of the TES relationship is illustrated by means of case law on unfair dismissals and unfair labour practice disputes. The article concludes by making recommendations to bolster the protection of TES employees and to reinforce equitable labour standards.
