Surplus? What surplus? Did the pension funds second amendment act achieve its aims
AbstractThe Pension Funds Second Amendment Act, 2001 required funds to provide statutory minimum benefits for exiting members and pensioners. Any surplus arising at the statutory valuation following the promulgation of this Act was to be distributed—initially to former members and pensioners to top up their benefits to the statutory minimum, and then equitably to all stakeholders. Surplus available in retirement funds was originally estimated at R80bn, but the surplus distributed by May 2012 was only about R47,6bn. This paper considers some reasons for this discrepancy and, in particular, gives an analysis of 447 surplus valuation reports. It shows that, by strengthening their valuation assumptions and motivating contingency reserves, actuaries reduced the surplus by R10bn for these 447 funds. The paper questions whether the strengthening of valuation bases was justified and examines critically the new actuarial methods introduced following the promulgation of the Act.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the Actuarial Society of South Africa
Actuarial Society of South Africa 2020
Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence.
For details see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
The views and opinions of this journal are, unless otherwise stated, those of the authors.
Editorial opinion or comment is, unless otherwise stated, that of the Editor and publication
thereof does not indicate the agreement of the Actuarial Society of South Africa.