Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 24, 2004Keywords:
General practice family medicine referral trainee
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
By submitting manuscripts to SAFP, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the SA Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care. Copyright of review articles are assigned to the Publisher, Medpharm Publications (Pty) Ltd, unless otherwise specified. Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAFP for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.
Main Article Content
A comparison of the referral rates of trainees and trainers in an academic teaching practice
Abstract
Objective: To compare the referral rates of trainee and trainer family physicians.
Setting: The practice of the Department of Family Medicine at the Medical University of Southern Africa, Pretoria.
Design: Analysis of 43 028 problem encounters selected from one in-service practice database.
Participants: Thirteen junior registrars, seven senior registrars in a Master's programme and seven senior physicians.
Main measure: Referral rates compared by the Generalised Linear Mixed Model to allow for case mix and variation between the three study groups.
Results: Adjusted referral rates per thousand problem encounters were 97.7 for junior registrars (95% CI 79.4 - 120.7), 77.1 for senior registrars (95%CI 59.3 - 99.5) and 73.7 for senior physicians (95% CI 54.4 - 99.2). Differences between the groups were not statistically significant (Wald chi-square = 3.90; df = 2; P = 0.195). There was insufficient evidence to show that the large amount of variation in the referral rates of doctors within study groups was different between the three groups.
Conclusions: Using a performance-oriented database and an advanced method for adjusting for case mix makes a difference to referral rates. There was no significant difference between the mean referral rates of trainees and trainers. There was a large amount of variation within all three groups. Together, these findings support the thesis that factors other than clinical diagnosis in the behaviour of doctors or their interaction with patients are determinants of the referral decision. This points to the value of peer reviewing of referral rates for both trainees and trainers during vocational training, as well as in group practices.
Key Words: General practice, family medicine, referral, trainee
For full text, click here: SA Fam Pract 2004;46(4):21-25
Setting: The practice of the Department of Family Medicine at the Medical University of Southern Africa, Pretoria.
Design: Analysis of 43 028 problem encounters selected from one in-service practice database.
Participants: Thirteen junior registrars, seven senior registrars in a Master's programme and seven senior physicians.
Main measure: Referral rates compared by the Generalised Linear Mixed Model to allow for case mix and variation between the three study groups.
Results: Adjusted referral rates per thousand problem encounters were 97.7 for junior registrars (95% CI 79.4 - 120.7), 77.1 for senior registrars (95%CI 59.3 - 99.5) and 73.7 for senior physicians (95% CI 54.4 - 99.2). Differences between the groups were not statistically significant (Wald chi-square = 3.90; df = 2; P = 0.195). There was insufficient evidence to show that the large amount of variation in the referral rates of doctors within study groups was different between the three groups.
Conclusions: Using a performance-oriented database and an advanced method for adjusting for case mix makes a difference to referral rates. There was no significant difference between the mean referral rates of trainees and trainers. There was a large amount of variation within all three groups. Together, these findings support the thesis that factors other than clinical diagnosis in the behaviour of doctors or their interaction with patients are determinants of the referral decision. This points to the value of peer reviewing of referral rates for both trainees and trainers during vocational training, as well as in group practices.
Key Words: General practice, family medicine, referral, trainee
For full text, click here: SA Fam Pract 2004;46(4):21-25
