Article Sidebar
Published:
May 23, 2017Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Material submitted for publication in the South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyl (SAJOG) is accepted provided it has not been published elsewhere. Copyright forms will be sent with acknowledgement of receipt and the SAJOG reserves copyright of the material published.
The SAJOG does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Main Article Content
Preventive role of low-molecular-weight heparin in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss
Abstract
Background. Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a source of great distress for couples, and the search continues for an intervention to improve live birth rates in affected women. A daily injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is often prescribed to women with unexplained RPL, although evidence suggesting a benefit is limited.
Objective. To compare the efficacy of LMWH with a placebo in terms of live birth rates in women with unexplained RPL.
Methods. All pregnant females between 18 and 44 years of age who reported at the unit of obstetrics and gynaecology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, during April 2013 to January 2014, who had a history of ≥2 consecutive first trimester pregnancy losses were enrolled. All participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group A received a daily dose of 40 mg enoxaparin (LMWH) subcutaneously and group B women received a placebo in the form of multivitamin tablets. Efficacy was defined in terms of live births after the age of viability (i.e. 24 weeks’ gestation) and was compared in both treatment and control groups. Risk estimation was also performed and relative risk (RR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated.
Results. The groups were similar in terms of mean age, gestational age and body mass index. Our results showed no statistically significant difference in live birth rates between the two groups, with 78.8% and 73.8% for group A and B, respectively (p=0.0574). A RR of 1.07 (95% CI 0.9 - 1.3) was calculated for group A.
Conclusion. Subcutaneous enoxaparin in a once daily dose of 40 mg did not improve the chance of live births in nonthrombophilic women with unexplained RPL when compared with the placebo.
Objective. To compare the efficacy of LMWH with a placebo in terms of live birth rates in women with unexplained RPL.
Methods. All pregnant females between 18 and 44 years of age who reported at the unit of obstetrics and gynaecology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, during April 2013 to January 2014, who had a history of ≥2 consecutive first trimester pregnancy losses were enrolled. All participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group A received a daily dose of 40 mg enoxaparin (LMWH) subcutaneously and group B women received a placebo in the form of multivitamin tablets. Efficacy was defined in terms of live births after the age of viability (i.e. 24 weeks’ gestation) and was compared in both treatment and control groups. Risk estimation was also performed and relative risk (RR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated.
Results. The groups were similar in terms of mean age, gestational age and body mass index. Our results showed no statistically significant difference in live birth rates between the two groups, with 78.8% and 73.8% for group A and B, respectively (p=0.0574). A RR of 1.07 (95% CI 0.9 - 1.3) was calculated for group A.
Conclusion. Subcutaneous enoxaparin in a once daily dose of 40 mg did not improve the chance of live births in nonthrombophilic women with unexplained RPL when compared with the placebo.
