Article Sidebar
Published:
May 11, 2023Keywords:
Article Details
Submission of a manuscript to this journal is a representation that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
All authors named in each manuscript would be required to sign a form (to be supplied by the Editor) so that they may retain their copyright in the article but to assign to us (the Publishers) and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known or created in the future) to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the contribution, (ii) translate the contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or abstracts of the contribution, (iii) create any other derivative works(s) based on the contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the contribution to third party material where-ever it may be located, and (vi) license any thrid party to do any or all of the above.
Main Article Content
Anesthetic effect of sufentanil in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of sufentanil on anesthesia in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
Methods: The subjects comprised a total of 100 patients who were scheduled to undergo cardiovascular surgery in Taikang Tongji (Wuhan) Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 and met the inclusion criteria. The eligible patients were assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive either remifentanil (control group) or sufentanil (study group) during cardiovascular surgery, with 50 patients in each group. The anesthetic effect of remifentanil and sufentanil was compared.
Results: Patients treated with sufentanil experienced a faster onset of anesthesia and a shorter time-lapse before extubation, postoperative spontaneous breathing recovery, and postoperative anesthesia recovery when compared with those administered with remifentanil (p < 0.05). Sufentanil provided more potent pain mitigation for patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery than remifentanil, as shown by the lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of patients in the study group (p < 0.05). Patients administered with sufentanil showed better levels of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) than remifentanil, suggesting better hemodynamic benefits provided by sufentanil (p < 0.01). During cardiovascular surgery performed in this study, sufentanil resulted in a higher safety profile by reducing significantly the incidence of adverse reactions (6 %) than remifentanil (30 %) (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Sufentanil exhibits a better anesthetic effect in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery than remifentanil. It provides potent pain mitigation, effectively ameliorates patients’ hemodynamic status, and reduces the risk of adverse reactions. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate these findings.
