Main Article Content

The development of water quality methods within ecological Reserve assessments, and links to environmental flows


CG Palmer
N Rossouw
WJ Muller
P-A Scherman

Abstract



In the South African National Water Act (NWA, No 36 of 1998), the ecological Reserve is defined as the quality and quantity
of water required to ensure appropriate protection of water resources, so as to secure ecologically sustainable development
and use. Aquatic ecosystems are recognised as the core location of water resources, and although considerable progress has
been made in developing methods for quantifying environmental flow requirements, this paper describes and discusses the
first agreed method for quantifying environmental water quality requirements in an ecological Reserve assessment. Integration
of flow and water quality is emphasised, and is based on the philosophy that environmental flows should be motivated to
provide ecologically important flow-related habitat, or geomorphological function, but should not be motivated to solve water
quality problems by dilution. Water quality is multivariate, and not all variables can be considered in an ecological Reserve
assessment, but core water quality variables include: system variables (salts, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, temperature), nutrients
(phosphate, nitrite, nitrate) and toxic substances (those listed in the South African Water Quality Guidelines for Aquatic
Ecosystems, including toxic metal ions, toxic organic substances, and/or substances from a chemical inventory of an effluent
or discharge). In addition, biological indicator data (e.g. SASS data), chlorophyll-a (e.g. phytoplankton and periphyton data)
and toxicity test data may be used. For each variable, a concentration range or response is linked to a class within a water
resource classification system, where classes range from minimally to severely modified. There are five main stages in the
environmental water quality method:
• Initiate study and determine scope of assessment.
• Delineate water quality sub-units.
• Select sites and collect data and information.
• Determine benchmarks, including generic boundary values (literature-based concentrations related to classes); the unimpacted,
natural or reference condition; the present ecological state; and the contribution of water quality to the overall
ecosystem importance and sensitivity.
• Provide quantified and qualitative water quality objectives for each ecosystem health class, and each variable in each
resource unit. These steps are integrated with environmental flow assessment procedures. After environmental flows have
been recommended to achieve a selected level of protection (class), flow-concentration relationships are modelled, and
the likely water quality consequences of modified flows are provided to resource managers, who then decide on whether
to allocate water for dilution and/or to address the pollution problem directly using source controls.

Water SA Vol. 31 (2) 2005: pp.161-170

Journal Identifiers


eISSN: 1816-7950
print ISSN: 0378-4738