A post-divorce cohabitation never equals a remarriage in Ethiopia: A case comment
AbstractThe conclusion of a (re)marriage is required to be made in one of the three modes of celebration under the Revised Family Code. Despite the legal significance of the celebration of a (re)marriage as a decisive element in the conclusion and proof of the (re)marriage, the Cassation Division of the Federal Supreme Court decided a case in which the post-divorce non-marital cohabitation between ex-spouses was considered to constitute a remarriage. In the decision, the court essentially over-looked the need for proof of the celebration of the remarriage. The author argues that the decision contradicts with the relevant legal rules. Thus, this case comment attempts to make a critical analysis of the various legal issues involved in the case at different levels with particular emphasis on the decision of the Cassation Divi-sion. In the analysis, the author argues that a post-divorce non-marital cohabita-tion would not amount to a remarriage between the ex-spouses. The reason is that the conclusion of the alleged remarriage between the ex-spouses would be pre-sumed only upon proof of its celebration in a certain form under the Revised Fami-ly Code.
Keywords: cohabitation, celebration, divorce, irregular union, marriage, proof, remarriage
The Journal/College of Law/Haramaya University shall have copyright over the contributions published in the Journal. However, authors may republish their works with prior permission from the College. Details shall be regulated by the applicable laws of the country. The Journal is protected by Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derives [CC BY-NC-ND] license.