Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 13, 2017Article Details
Copyright remains in the Author’s name. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial Works License. Authors are required to complete and sign an Author Agreement form that outlines Author and Publisher rights and terms of publication. The Agreement form should be uploaded along with other submissions files and any submission will be considered incomplete without it [forthcoming].
Material submitted for publication in the SAMJ is accepted provided it has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Please inform the editorial team if the main findings of your paper have been presented at a conference and published in abstract form, to avoid copyright infringement. The SAMJ does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.
Previously published images
If an image/figure has been previously published, permission to reproduce or alter it must be obtained by the authors from the original publisher and the figure legend must give full credit to the original source. This credit should be accompanied by a letter indicating that permission to reproduce the image has been granted to the author/s. This letter should be uploaded as a supplementary file during submission.
Main Article Content
Effect of the <i>maternal care manual </i>from the perinatal education programme on the quality of antenatal and intrapartum care rendered by midwives
Abstract
Design. A prospective controlled study.
Setting. A study town and two control towns in the Eastern Cape.
Subjects. Before the study a sample of files was drawn to provide baseline information. Subsequently all the midwives in the study town studied the manual, following which a second sample of files was drawn.
Outcome measures. A check-list was used to assess antenatal cards and partograms.
Results. The mean score allocated to the four subunits evaluating the front page of the antenatal card in the study town improved significantly (P = 0.000) from 58.5% (standard deviation (SD) 20.6) to 74.5% (SD 19.2). No changes occurred in the control towns (47.5% and 52.9%). The score obtained for the completion of the back page also improved significantly (P = 0.014), from 69% (SD 13.7) to 75.6% (SD 14.2), with no changes in the control towns. The mean score achieved for the completion of the partogram did not change in the study town or control towns.
Conclusions. The improved scores obtained for the antenatal card in the study town reflects improved quality of antenatal care. Documentation that improved significantly included important aspects of antenatal care, i.e. previous obstetric
history, gestational age, special investigations and correct charting offundal growth. Three of the four subunits that did not improve were already familiar to the midwives before the study. Documentation of the partogram did not improve for reasons outside the control of the PEP.
