Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 13, 2023DOI:
10.4314/ahs.v23i2.69Keywords:
Article Details
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Observation of the clinical effect of immediate implantation and delayed implantation in the maxillary and maxillary molars
Abstract
Objective: To study the clinical application effect of two kinds of implants in the upper and lower molars.
Methods: A selection of 120 patients (134 teeth) who underwent implant treatment in the upper and lower molars in the army
hospital of the Chinese people’s liberation army from January 2018 to June 2019 were divided into an immediate group (using
immediate implantation) and a delayed group (using delayed implantation) using a random number table 60 cases (60 teeth) in
each group; differences in implant success rate, buccal keratinized gingival width before and after treatment, alveolar bone absorption, periodontal pocket depth, and gingival aesthetic indicators were compared between the two groups.
Results: The gingival aesthetics effect of the immediate group was better than that of the delayed group on the whole and the
difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); after 12 months of restoration, the implantation success rate of the immediate
group was 96.67%. The deferred group was 93.33%, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant
(P>0.05).
Conclusion: Both delayed restoration and immediate implant restoration can achieve good results in implant restoration treatment
in the maxillary and maxillary molars. However, immediate implantation has certain advantages in reducing the amount of alveolar bone absorption and maintaining the aesthetic effect of the gums.
Keywords: Aesthetics; alveolar bone resorption; delayed implantation; immediate implantation; molars.
