Article Sidebar
Article Details
Open access articles published in the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology are under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
Copyright on any research article published in the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology is retained by the author(s). The authors grant the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology with a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
Use of the article in whole or in part in any medium requires proper citation as follows:
Title of Article, Names of the Author, Year of Publication, Journal Title, Volume (Issue) and page. Links to the final article on the JSRE website are encouraged.
The Creative Commons Attribution License does not affect any other rights held by authors or third parties in the article, including without limitation the rights of privacy and publicity. Use of the article must not assert or imply, whether implicitly or explicitly, any connection with, endorsement or sponsorship of such use by the author, publisher or any other party associated with the article.
For any reuse or distribution, users must include the copyright notice and make clear to others that the article is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution license, linking to the relevant Creative Commons web page. Users may impose no restrictions on the use of the article other than those imposed by the Creative Commons Attribution license.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the article is made available as is and without representation or warranties of any kind whether express, implied, statutory or otherwise and including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, absence of defects, accuracy, or the presence or absence of errors.
Main Article Content
Factors Influencing Awareness of Forest Benefits and Attitudes Towards Conservation in Kipini Division of Tana Delta District, Kenya
Abstract
Many benefits can be derived from forest conservation initiatives. Yet incidences of forest destruction by local communities are very common. This study examined the awareness of forest benefits and attitudes of households towards conservation of
forests. The Zero Truncated Poisson model was used to assess the factors affecting awareness of forest benefits. Descriptive and factor analysis methods were used to assess the attitudes of local communities towards forest conservation. Data on forest
use, rules and regulations of product harvesting, awareness of forest benefits, attitudes on forest conservation and household socio-economic characteristics was collected from 150 households in Kipini Division of Tana Delta District, Kenya. A pre-tested
questionnaire was administered to each of the households through personal interviews. The division had three types of forest management regimes i.e. Kenya Forest Service (KFS), community and private conservancy. The results showed that households had average level of awareness of both direct and indirect forest benefits with means of 12, 11 and 9 for KFS, community and private conservancy, respectively. The model results showed that income, gender, farm size and management regimes influence awareness of forest benefits. Though education did not affect awareness of the number of forest benefits, Wald test results for education combined with income had statistically significant effect (p<0.05). Descriptive results indicated that the Likert scale mean score of the respondents was 54, 10, 56 and 34% of the respondents had scores above, on the borderline and below the Likert scale mean score respectively. Respondents with scores on the borderline and below the mean were deemed to have negative attitudes towards conservation and were grouped together. Thus only 10% of the respondents had a positive attitude. Hence it was concluded that the local community has negative attitude towards conservation of forests. Factor analysis produced five factors that accounted for 75.2% of the total explained variance. The first factor was education and knowledge of conservation which accounted for 28.7% of the total explained variance. The other factors were interaction and application of knowledge (15.7%), social and economic commitment (11.4%), personal initiative (10.8%) and consultation & goal achievement (8.4%). These results imply that forest conservation can be enhanced by creating awareness of direct and indirect benefits of conservation by use of easy to understand approaches. Formal education raises awareness of benefits of conserving the environment while the informal education can greatly change households’ attitude towards forest conservation.
