Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 20, 2025Keywords:
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
(i) AJER is an open-access journal. This means that all content is freely available to all. The author retains the copyrights associated with their work within AJER’s policy framework.
(ii) All articles can be accessed freely without any limitations of use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium so long as they are expressly cited.
(iii) The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, may not mean that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations in their respective countries.
(iv) The publisher believes that all information is true and accurate at the time of going to press. In this regard, the authors, editors, and publishers cannot accept any legal responsibility for any errors, typos or omissions that may be made. There is thus no warranty for the materials contained in the articles.
Main Article Content
Role of kinship social structures in anti-livestock rustling policy implementation in Kuria West sub-county, Kenya
Mokami David Wambura
Edmond Maloba Were
Godfrey Ungaya
Abstract
Livestock rustling is a global problem that requires concerted stakeholder interventions. In Kenya, despite dedicated state interventions, including the enactment of anti-livestock rustling policies, the frequency of livestock rustling has not dissipated. This indicates a policy implementation deficiency with regard to stakeholder and agenda inclusivity. This study investigated the influence of kinship social structures on policy implementation against livestock rustling. The study was anchored in the ecological theory of public administration and social control theory. It employed a mixed research design to help collect and analyze data on kinship social networks and their contribution to the implementation of anti-livestock rustling policy and regulations in Kuria West Sub-County. The study was conducted in Kuria West, an arable zone in Kenya, to provide valuable insights on the dynamics of livestock rustling in contrast to its conventional perception as a pastoralist norm characteristic of arid and semi-arid zones. The target population of the study was households and government actors, for instance, deputy county commissioners, chiefs, assistant chiefs, village heads, and the council of elders. The sample size of this study was 496 respondents, consisting of 396 household heads, 47 government actors, and 50 council of elders that were randomly and purposively selected. Methods of data collection included a household questionnaire, interviews with government actors, and focused group discussions with the council of elders. The study adopted Cronbach’s metrics of alpha to determine the internal consistency of the instrument. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages), while qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis. Collected data was presented in tables. The study findings established that kinship social structures significantly influence anti-livestock rustling policy implementation in Kuria West, Kenya. The study concludes that collaborative governance models that incorporate clan leaders, recognize cultural contexts, and strengthen formal-informal coordination offer the most promising pathway to sustainable, inclusive solutions to livestock rustling.
