Perceptions of torture prevalence and accountability in Nigeria: A multi-stakeholder perspective

Abstract

This paper examines the perceptions of torture prevalence and accountability in Nigeria, shedding light on the awareness and attitudes across various sectors, including legal, psychological, and civil society. Utilising a quantitative survey methodology that employed structured questionnaires to gather responses from 168 stakeholders, the research captures insights on the normalisation of torture and the deficiencies in justice and support for victims. The findings reveal a troubling acknowledgement that, despite legal prohibitions, torture remains a pervasive aspect in Nigeria, highlighting systemic failures that impede accountability and victim support. The thesis posits that the prevalence of torture highlights significant gaps in accountability, justice, and support for victims, necessitating comprehensive reforms that enhance legal protections and foster a culture of human rights awareness. By addressing the complexities surrounding torture in Nigeria and advocating for the need for targeted reforms, this paper is particularly relevant to the journal's mission to critically re-evaluate existing approaches to human rights from an Afrocentric viewpoint. The paper contributes to the broader discourse on human rights issues within the continent while pushing for the need for a comprehensive reflection and new perspectives essential for addressing the challenges faced in the region.