Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 15, 2026Keywords:
Article Details
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publication rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose. AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Note: If you need to comply with your funding body policy, you can apply for the CC BY license after your manuscript is accepted for publication.
Main Article Content
Exploring occupational therapy interventions in homeless settings in Tshwane
Sarah Ainsworth
Helga E. Lister
Michelle N.S. Janse van Rensburg
Abstract
Background: In South Africa, the national lockdown was both a challenge and an opportunity to address health-related issues of homelessness. While initial emergency responses in Tshwane focused on basic needs and medical intervention, the need for more holistic intervention became evident.
Aim: To understand the experiences and perceptions, benefits and facilitators, and barriers and challenges of university-driven occupational therapy interventions with people experiencing homelessness in Tshwane during the various coronavirus disease 2019 lockdown levels and beyond to March 2023.
Setting: Research was conducted in various homeless settings, such as temporary shelters, transitional- or permanent housing facilities or drop-in centres, where occupational therapy intervention was implemented.
Methods: An explorative, descriptive qualitative design was used, with focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews conducted with people experiencing homelessness and homeless practitioners. These were audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Student-written occupational therapy planning and feedback documents were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis and interpreted using the Capability Approach.
Results: Inputs and conversion factors positively influencing intervention outcomes included a supportive environment, client-centred care, therapeutic activities in small groups, ensuring positive volition, and understanding the real-life experiences of participants. Challenges included unsupportive environments, language barriers, poor attitudes and motivation, and lack of continuity of occupational therapy intervention.
Conclusion: Occupational therapy intervention in homeless settings is valuable, as it considers personal, social and environmental aspects affecting a person’s functioning.
Contribution: Applying the unique contribution of occupational therapy intervention in homeless settings will improve overall health- and social service delivery.
