Article Sidebar
Published:
Nov 6, 2026Keywords:
Article Details
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publication rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose. AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Note: If you need to comply with your funding body policy, you can apply for the CC BY license after your manuscript is accepted for publication.
Main Article Content
Bridging the gap: Investigating somatologists’ knowledge of regulatory bodies in the Free State province of South Africa
Adri Claassen
Juanita Jonker
Ronelle Jansen
Abstract
Background: Somatology practice in South Africa continues to expand through advanced aesthetic modalities; however, the profession remains without statutory regulation. Fragmented governance structures create risks regarding client safety, professional accountability and ethical practice. Understanding somatologists’ regulatory knowledge is important for future governance and regulatory progression.
Aim: To investigate somatologists’ knowledge and understanding of regulatory entities relevant to the profession in the Free State province.
Setting: The study included practising somatologists and salon owners in the Free State province of South Africa.
Methods: A quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional design was used. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed by two industry suppliers via WhatsApp and administered through QuestionPro. A total of 143 responses were included. Descriptive statistics assessed familiarity with relevant regulatory entities.
Results: Respondents demonstrated strong recognition of voluntary entities such as the South African Association of Health and Skincare Professionals, but limited awareness of statutory councils. Considerable uncertainty existed regarding regulatory functions, registration requirements and organisational mandates. Knowledge of continuing professional development requirements was limited despite its high perceived value.
Conclusion: The findings support future educational interventions, professional communication strategies and policy discussions regarding statutory regulation.
Contribution: This study provides evidence on regulatory knowledge within an unregulated profession,
