Article Sidebar
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
Either the Editor, the Editorial Board (individually or collectively) or the Development and Management Study Group (DMSG) assumes any responsibility for statements of facts or opinions in the papers published and are therefore absolved of any legal liability. The authors are in every way responsible for the contents of individual articles.
Reproduction of any sort, including photocopying of this journal or portions of it, or any storage whatsoever, by any person(s) without prior permission of the copyright owners, is prohibited.
© Copyright reserved by Development and Management Study Group (DMGS)
Main Article Content
The rivalry between quantitative and qualitative techniques in sociological research: a discourse
Abstract
This paper examined quantitative and qualitative techniques as applicable to sociological research. It reviewed their characteristics, merits and problems and decried seeming rivalry and tendency for some sociologists to view the two approaches in opposition. It argues that although either quantitative or qualitative technique may have comparative advantage in some specific research circumstances, yet the two techniques are mutually inclusive and complement each other in sociological inquiry. The two techniques are therefore relevant for fuller appreciation of social reality.
Keywords: Rivarly, Quantitative, Qualitative, Research, Mutual co-existence, Complementary
Keywords: Rivarly, Quantitative, Qualitative, Research, Mutual co-existence, Complementary
