Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 29, 2025Keywords:
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright in all material published in PER/PELJ vests in the author, provided that authors grant, by submission of their contributions, permission that their contributions may be shared and adapted without restriction. An author furthermore agrees that the same contribution may not be published elsewhere without the written permission of the editor.
Anyone gaining access, electronically or otherwise, to a contribution to PER, may quote from such contribution, use the intellectual content thereof, share and adapt it, but subject to the following conditions:
you must give appropriate credit, provide a link and indicate if changes were made; and
the copyright of the author(s) may not be infringed in any way.
Main Article Content
A critical discussion of the law regarding the recognition of traditional leaders and the role of the royal families in South Africa
Siyabonga Sibisi
Abstract
Traditional leadership is constitutionally entrenched in section 212 of the South African Constitution, 1996. As it is the oldest form of government in the country, there is always curiosity pertaining to matters of traditional leadership. The place of traditional leadership in a democracy, where leaders are elected, is also debatable. However, the recent events in traditional communities, including the death of certain notable traditional leaders and the legal tussles that engulfed their nations following their deaths, have sparked an interest in the law regarding the recognition of traditional leaders. This article, therefore, critically discusses the law regarding the appointment of traditional leaders. It discusses the statutory law and the customary law of hereditary succession, as well as the role of royal families in governance. It also considers some contentious issues, such as the succession of people born out of wedlock and of women into positions of traditional leadership.
