Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 15, 2026Keywords:
Article Details
http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/pages/view/policies#part_4
Copyright
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose.
AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
Read more here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Main Article Content
Catatonia knowledge in medical practitioners from low-resource settings
Andrea K. Kaddu
Daisy C. Saina
Zahra Morawej
Wilber Ssembajjwe
Andrew S. Ssemata
Rossette I. Ndigamanya
Kristien van der Walt
Allan Kalungi
Dickens Akena
Noeline Nakasujja
Emmanuel K. Mwesiga
Abstract
Background: Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric emergency that requires rapid intervention to prevent complications. It is unclear whether African medical practitioners have the requisite knowledge to identify and manage catatonia.
Aim: To examine knowledge of catatonia among medical practitioners across partnering institutions of the African Catatonia Registry (ACR), a multi-country resource for research in Africa.
Setting: The study was conducted among medical practitioners across the ACR partnering institutions.
Methods: The study was a descriptive, cross-sectional online survey comprising 63 questions to examine knowledge of catatonia. Responses were scored with a positive mark if correct and a negative mark if wrong, then standardised and dichotomised to indicate low or sufficient knowledge.
Results: Out of 321 participants, nearly half (46.7%) were psychiatrists, and 50.8% had sufficient knowledge of catatonia. Multivariate analysis showed that knowledge varied by sub-domain, country, specialty and prior experience with catatonia. Specialisation in
psychiatry was significantly associated with sufficient knowledge of classification (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.15 [95% confidence intervals {CI}: 1.35–3.43]), diagnostic symptoms (aRR = 3.30 [95% CI: 1.62–6.69]), screening (aRR = 4.72 [95% CI: 2.25–9.91]) and rating scales (aRR = 3.34 [95% CI: 1.32–8.46]). Prior experience with catatonia was also associated with sufficient knowledge across these areas (all p ≤ 0.05).
Conclusion: While knowledge of catatonia and its diagnostic criteria is sufficient among practitioners, knowledge of its symptoms, treatment and complication management remains low.
Contribution: The study highlights the need for the ACR to promote improvements in the identification and management of catatonia to achieve better patient outcomes.
