Article Sidebar
Published:
May 9, 2025Keywords:
Article Details
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Perceptions about reduced antenatal care contacts to a minimum of eight and its associated factors among pregnant women in Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Scheduling antenatal care (ANC) contacts in line with WHO-recommended minimum of eight can reduce costs for pregnant women and health systems without compromising quality of care.
Objectives: Assess how pregnant women perceive reduced frequency of scheduled ANC contacts from a minimum of twelve to eight and associated factors.
Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 363 pregnant women receiving ANC in Nigeria. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25; Chicago, IL.
Results: Mean age of respondents was 30.5 ± 5.2 years. Majority had previous ANC experience in at least 1 previous pregnancy (61.7%), were satisfied (79.6%) with the ANC received, and had a negative perception (63.9%; 95%CI: 59.3% - 68.0%) of reduced frequency of scheduled ANC contacts. Satisfaction with ANC received, low social class, and living far from the hospital were the predictors of negative perception.
Conclusion: Women who were satisfied with the traditional model of ANC received, tend to perceive a reduction in the frequency of scheduled ANC contacts negatively. Low social class and living far from the hospital were other predictors of negative perception. Therefore, the characteristics and community features of the population being served should underlie the decision on the frequency of scheduled ANC contacts.
Keywords: Antenatal care contacts; Perception; Minimum of eight contacts.
