PROMOTING ACCESS TO AFRICAN RESEARCH

African Journal of Urology

Log in or Register to get access to full text downloads.

Remember me or Register



Detrusor wall thickness compared to other non-invasivemethods in diagnosing men with bladder outletobstruction: A prospective controlled study

W ElSaied, A Mosharafa, H ElFayoumy, M ElGhoniemy, A Ziada, H ElGhamrawy, A Ibrahim, M Abdel-Azim

Abstract


Introduction: The current study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of detrusor wall thickness to othernoninvasive, tools, using pressure flow studies as a reference, in the assessment of bladder outlet, obstructionamong men presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Patients and Methods: Men aged 50 or older presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms were evaluatedfor bladder outlet, obstruction using detrusor wall thickness (measured by a transabdominal 7.5 MHz ultra-sound) and, other non-invasive tools (namely uroflowmetry, post-void residual, and prostate volume), andthe results were compared to pressure flow study.

Results: Detrusor wall thickness ranged from 0.7 mm to 7 mm (mean ± SD of 2.39 ± 1.64 mm), and 21patients, were classified as obstructed (thickness ≥ 2 mm). Based on pressure flow study 23 patients had,bladder outlet obstruction. Detrusor wall thickness had the highest accuracy (88.0%), the highest, specificity(92.6%) and the highest positive predictive value (90.5%) among the non-invasive tests.

Keywords: Bladder; Detrusor; Lower urinary tractsymptoms; Male; Prostatic hyperplasia; Prostatic outflowobstruction; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound




http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2013.03.003
AJOL African Journals Online