Hearsay evidence is the submission of evidence by a person based on what s/he has heard from another person who has not appeared in court. This article examines the extent to which hearsay evidence is admissible in common law and civil law. The core theme addressed in this article is whether hearsay evidence should be admissible in Ethiopia. Comparative study is used in analyzing the experience under common law and civil law. Ethiopia’s Constitution, Criminal Justice Policy, the laws on civil and criminal procedure, and other laws are explored. Moreover, reference is made to court decisions. The article analyzes the two perspectives that are forwarded in response to the issue whether hearsay evidence should be admissible in Ethiopia. Article 20(4) of the Ethiopian Constitution guarantees the right of defendants (in criminal cases) to confront evidence submitted against them, and the Criminal Justice Policy embodies a similar stipulation. The author argues that hearsay evidence should not, in principle, be admissible, and its admissibility should only be allowed under the exceptions that ought to be expressly stated in the law.
Article text is in Amharic
a) Copyright of the content of the articles shall be retained by the author subject to the condition that it cannot be republished in another journal. The reproduction of the article as book chapter requires the acknowledgement of its prior publication in Mizan Law Review.
b) An author is entitled to deposit her/his published article in any Open Access repository subject to the condition that the format and layout shall not be changed. Depositing a post-publication version in any repository requires acknowledgement of the earlier version by indicating the Volume, Issue and page numbers of the version published in Mizan Law Review.
c) Articles published in Mizan Law Review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)
a) Where the Editorial Team deems it necessary, the editors may remove precise reference to names of individuals in case comments.
b) The names and email addresses submitted to and published in Mizan Law Review shall not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Opinions expressed in articles, comments, case comments and sharing thoughts do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editorial Team, or the publisher of the journal, i.e., Center for Law in Sustainable Development, St. Mary’s University.